Integrated Watershed Management

Integrated Watershed Management

Analyzing the governance structure of the water-energy-food nexus on Qeshm Island: A social network analysis approach

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Parastou Rajabpour Nikou 1
Mehdi Ghorbani 2
Sharareh Pourebrahim 1
Alireza Gharagozlou 3
1 Department of Environmental Planning and Management, College of Environment, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
2 Department of Reclamation of Arid and Mountainous Regions, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
3 Department of Geomatics Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Water and Environmental Science, University of Shahid Beheshti, Tehran, Iran
10.22034/iwm.2025.2056408.1214
Abstract
Extended Abstract
Introduction: Effective management of critical resources such as water, energy, and food is essential due to their strong interdependence—changes in one sector often impact the others. Rapid population growth, economic development, and escalating climate change are intensifying challenges in resource management worldwide. The Water-Energy-Food (WEF) nexus framework has emerged as a comprehensive approach to address these complexities by integrating environmental, social, economic, and political dimensions. This framework is especially relevant for arid and semi-arid regions like Iran, where water scarcity exerts considerable pressure on local governance systems. Qeshm Island, the largest island in the Persian Gulf, exemplifies the difficulties of managing the WEF nexus under such constraints. Fragmented policymaking and weak coordination across water, energy, and food sectors on the island highlight the urgent need for integrated management strategies and stronger inter-sectoral cooperation. This study aims to analyze and evaluate the governance structure of the WEF nexus on Qeshm Island using Social Network Analysis (SNA). The goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of institutional interactions and identify opportunities for enhancing sustainable resource management in the region.
Materials and Methods: This research adopts a descriptive-survey design with an applied focus on examining the governance network of the WEF nexus on Qeshm Island through SNA. The study investigates inter-organizational relationships across the water, energy, and food sectors by collecting primary data via 123 questionnaires distributed equally among sector experts and officials. Additionally, document reviews and field visits complemented data collection efforts. Network data were analyzed using UCINET6 software, focusing on key metrics such as network density, reciprocity, transitivity, centralization, average geodesic distance, and core-periphery structure. This approach allows for an in-depth assessment of the governance network, revealing institutional dynamics and pinpointing areas requiring policy and management improvements. The findings provide a foundational basis for developing integrated and effective governance frameworks for the island’s critical resources.
Results and Discussion: Analysis reveals significant governance challenges within Qeshm Island’s WEF nexus. The overall low network density indicates limited collaboration and underutilization of institutional capacity. Among the sectors, the energy network showed the highest density, suggesting better coordination, whereas the food network exhibited the lowest density, highlighting critical weaknesses in collaboration. Reciprocity scores were moderate, demonstrating some mutual communication among stakeholders; however, weak transitivity—particularly in the food sector—suggests a lack of sustained tripartite interactions necessary for cohesive governance. Centralization measures revealed that governance is highly concentrated around a few key organizations, with the food network showing the greatest centralization, potentially restricting the system’s adaptability. The high average geodesic distance points to slow information and resource flows, especially within the food network, further impeding effective governance. Core-periphery analysis identified two central institutions—the Qeshm Free Trade Zone Organization and the Governor’s Office—as dominant nodes facilitating inter-sectoral linkages. These results collectively indicate that despite some institutional interactions, the governance structure remains fragmented and inefficient.
Conclusion: This study highlights the institutional strengths and weaknesses within the water, energy, and food governance networks on Qeshm Island through rigorous network analysis. While there is some collaboration, significant opportunities exist to improve coordination and cohesion among stakeholders. Enhancing inter-sectoral communication, broadening stakeholder participation, and adopting integrated governance approaches are crucial to increasing the sustainability and resilience of resource systems on the island. The prominent role of the Qeshm Free Trade Zone Organization underscores the potential of leveraging key institutions to strengthen weaker sectors, notably the food network. Moreover, considering informal relationships and the influence of macro-level policies—both national and international—will be essential for a more comprehensive understanding of governance challenges and opportunities. Future research should also explore the role of non-state actors in this nexus. Ultimately, reforming governance structures and fostering stronger institutional cooperation is vital for the sustainable management of water, energy, and food resources in Qeshm Island, and these findings offer actionable insights for policymakers aiming to address complex resource challenges in similar contexts.
Keywords
Water-Energy-Food Nexus
Collaborative Management
Social Network Analysis
Inter-institutional Cooperation
Qeshm Island
Subjects
Arvandi, S., Zare, A., & Afshar-Asal, M (2021). Water, energy, and food nexus in modern irrigation systems. Journal of Water Engineering Science, 9(4), 55-66. (In Persian)
Ashtari, H., Ghorbani, M., Khorasani, M. A., & Ghafari, S. (2024). Dynamic Analysis of Organizational Cohesion in the Implementation of the Development and Advancement Rural Plan (Case Study: Gachsaran County). Journal of Rural Research, 15(2), 382-397. (In Persian)
Bakhtavar, Z., Shateri, M., & Khosrozadeh, A. (2021). Petrographic analyses of unglazed painted pottery thin sections from the Islamic period in Qeshm Island. Iranian Archaeological Research Journal, 11(28), 153-172. [In Persian]
Belinskij, A. (2015). Water-energy-food nexus within the framework of international water law. Water, 7(10), 5396-5415.‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/w7105396
Benson, D., Gain, A. K., & Rouillard, J. J. (2015). Water governance in a comparative perspective: From IWRM to a ‘nexus’ approach? Water Alternatives, 8(1), 756–773. https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol8/v8issue1/275-a8-1-8
Bhaduri, A., Ringler, C., Dombrowski, I., Mohtar, R., & Scheumann, W. (2015). Sustainability in the water–energy–food nexus. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2015.1096110
Bodin, O., & Prell, C. (2011). Social network in natural resources management. Cambridge University Press.
Bordons, M; Apricio, J; Gonzalez-Albo, B. and Diaz-Faes, A.A. (2015). The relationship between the research performance of scientists and their position in co-authorship network in three fields. Journal of Informetrics, 9, 135-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.12.001
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2017.1282905
Cramer, M. E., Araz, O. M., & Wendl, M. J. (2017). Social Networking in An Agricultural Research Center: Using Data to Enhance Outcomes. Journal of Agromedicine, 22(2), 170-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2017.1282905
Daher, B., Mohtar, R. H., Lee, S. H., & Assi, A. (2017). Modeling the water‐energy‐food nexus: A 7‐question guideline. Water‐Energy‐Food Nexus: Principles and Practices, 55-66.‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119243175.ch6
El Majdoubi, G., & El Ayadi, H. (2024). Analyzing the Water, Energy, and Food Security Nexus Index in Morocco. In BIO Web of Conferences (Vol. 109, p. 01009). EDP Sciences.
Environmental Science & Policy, 162, 103933.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103933
Farmandeh, E., Choobchian, S., & Karami, S. (2024). Conducting water-energy-food nexus studies: what, why, and how. Scientific Report 14, 27310. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-79214-4
Garakani, S. A., Ghorbani, M., Ghafari, S., Avazpour, L., & Amiri, S. (2024). Evaluating Land Governance with Emphasis on Dynamics of Organizational Relationships (Case Study: Gachsaran County). Natural Resources Governance 1(2), 181-197. https://doi.org/10.22059/jnrg.2024.380088.1011 )In Persian(
Ghafari, S., Ghorbani, M., Salajegheh, A., Fritsch, O., Naderi, A., & Gain, A. K. (2024). Tracing water governance across different levels in Iran.
Ghanian, M. (2024). Exploring the food, energy, and water governance in South‐West Iran. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 16(2), 12578. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12578
Ghorbani, M., & Azadi, H. (2021). A social-relational approach for analyzing trust and collaboration networks as preconditions for rangeland comanagement. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 75, 170-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2020.10.008
Ghorbani, M., (2014). The Report of National Project: Social Network Analysis; Modeling, Policymaking and Implementation of Natural Resources Co-Management (Vol. 1), University of Tehran [In Persian]
Ghorbani, M., Azadi, H., Janečková, K., Sklenička, P., & Witlox, F. (2021). Sustainable Co-Management of arid regions in southeastern Iran: Social network analysis approach. Journal of Arid Environments, 192, 104540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2021.104540
Green, O.O., Garmestani, A.S., Van Rijswic, H.F.M.W., & Keessen, A.M. (2013). EU water governance: striking the right balance between regulatory flexibility and enforcement? Ecology and Society, 18(2), 10. http://doi.org/10.575/ES-05357-180210
Hanneman, R.A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. University of California Riverside, California.
Holling, C.S., Gunderson, L.H., & Ludwig, D. (2002). In the quest of a theory of adaptive change. In: Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S. (Eds.), Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.
Iran Meteorological Organization. (n.d.). Climate Atlas of Iran: Qeshm Island Data. Tehran: Research Center for Meteorology and Climatology.
Jones, J.L., & White, D.D. (2021). A social network analysis of collaborative governance for the food-energy-water nexus in Phoenix, AZ, USA. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 11(4), 671-681.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-021-00676-3
Kurian, M., Portney, K. E., Rappold, G., Hannibal, B., & Gebrechorkos, S. H. (2018). Governance of water-energy-food nexus: a social network analysis approach to understanding agency behaviour. Managing water, soil and waste resources to achieve sustainable development goals: monitoring and implementation of integrated resources management, 125-147.‏
Leck, H., Conway, D., Bradshaw, M., & Rees, J. (2015). Tracing the water–energy–food nexus: Description, theory and practice. Geography Compass, 9(8), 445-460.‏  https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12222
Magsi, H., & Torre, A. (2014). Proximity analysis of inefficient practices and socio-spatial negligence: Evidence, evaluations and recommendations drawn from the construction of Chotiari reservoir in Pakistan. Land Use Policy, 36, 567–576 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.10.009
Mahlknecht, J., Ramon Gonzalez-Bravo, Frank J. Loge. (2020). Water-energy-food security: A Nexus perspective of the current situation in Latin America and the Caribbean. Energy, Elsevier, volume 194 (March)
MAPNA Group. (n.d.). First in Iran. MAPNA MD3. Retrieved March 20, 2025, from https://mapnamd3.com/first-in-iran
McGinnis, M. D. (2011). An Introduction to IAD and the Language of the Ostrom Workshop: A Simple Guide to a Complex Framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 169-183.
Meisch, S., & Leese, M. (2015). Securitising sustainability? Questioning the 'water, energy and food-security nexus'. Water Alternatives, 8(1), 695–709.
Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, 2024.
Mohammad-Qoli, M. (2021). Sustainable production at Qeshm Gas Refinery. Shana News Agency.https://en.shana.ir/news/319958/Sustainable-Production-at-Qeshm-Gas-Refinery
Narayan, A.S., Fischer, M., Lüthi, C., (2020). Social Network Analysis for Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH): Application in Governance of Decentralized Wastewater Treatment in India Using a Novel Validation Methodology. Water and Wastewater Management. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00198
Newig, J., Gunther D., & Pehl-Wostl, C. (2010). Synapses in the network: learning in governance networks in the context of environmental management, Ecology and Society, 15(4), 24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26268211
Olsson, K., Klaver, M. W., & Finnis, L. (2007). Social Capital on Social Networking Sites: Interstitials in FeCr alloys studied by density functional theory. APS journals, volume 76, 214110. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.214110
Omondiagbe, H. A., Towns, D. R., Wood, J. K., & Bollard-Breen, B. (2017). Stakeholders and social networks identify potential roles of communities in sustainable management of invasive species. Biological Invasions, 19, 3037-3049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1506-1
Ostrom, E. (2011). Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x
Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., Walker, J. (1994). Rules, Games, and Common-pool Resources. University of Michigan Press.
Pahl-Wostl, C., & Knieper, C. (2014). The capacity of water governance to deal with the climate change adaptation challenge: Using fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis to distinguish between polycentric, fragmented and centralized regimes. Global Environmental Change, 29, 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.003
Polski, M. M., & Ostrom, E. (1999). An institutional framework for policy analysis and design. 1999.
Rahimi, M., Ghorbani, M., & Azadi, H. (2023). Structural characteristics of governmental and non-governmental institutions network: case of water governance system in Kor River basin in Iran. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 111, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02346-y
Rasul, G., & Neupane, N. (2021). Improving policy coordination across the water, energy, and food, sectors in South Asia: a framework. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, 602475. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.602475
Rojas, R., Bennison, G., Gálvez, V., Claro, E., & Castelblanco, G., (2020). Advancing Collaborative Water Governance: Unravelling Stakeholders’ Relationships and Influences in Contentious River Basins. Water 12, 3316. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123316
Rothman, D. W., & Mays, L. W. (2014). Water resources sustainability: Development of a multiobjective optimization model. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 140(12), 04014039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000425
Safaei, V., Pourmohammadi, Y., & Davari, K. (2019). Integrated approach to water, energy, and food nexus in water resources management. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 14(5), 1708-1721. )In Persian(
Sandström, A. C., & Rova, C. (2010). Adaptive co-management networks: A comparative analysis of two fishery conservation areas in Sweden. Ecology and Society, 15(3), 14. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03531-150314
Schmidt, J.I., Johnson, B., Huntington, H. P., & Whitney, E. (2022). A framework for assessing food-energy-water security: A WEF case studies from rural Alaska. Science of the Total Environment, Elsevier, Volume 821 (May), 153355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153355
Scott, A. (2017). Making governance work for water–energy–food nexus approaches. Climate and Development Knowledge Network (CDKN) Working Paper Series. London: Overseas Development Institute.
Scott, M. (2015). Re-Theorizing Social Network Analysis and Environmental Governance: Insights from Human Geography. Progress In Human Geography, 39(4), 449-463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132514554322
Simpson, G. B., & Jewitt, G. P. W. (2019). The      development of the water-energy-food nexus as     a framework for achieving resource security: A review. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 7, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00008
Sommerville, P., Former, R., Bunger, A., & Hempflin, C. (2015). Organizational network analysis: Nicaragua workforce development system. Washington, DC: LINC Local LLC. http://linclocal.org/tools/network-analysis
Stein, C., Barron, J., Nigussie, L., Gedif, B., Amsalu, T., & Langan, S. (2014). Advancing the water-energy-food nexus: social networks and institutional interplay in the Blue Nile.
Tasnim News Agency. (2024, April 8). 90% completion of water production and supply projects in Qeshm. Retrieved March 20, 2025, from https://www.tasnimnews.com/fa/news/1403/01/20/3065561
Urbinatti, A. M., de Oliveira, J. A. P., & Howlett, M. (2020). The conceptual basis of water-energy-food nexus governance: Systematic literature review using network and discourse analysis. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 17(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2020.1749086
Valente, T. W. (2012). Network interventions. Science, 337(6090), 49-53.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1217330
Weitz, N., Strambo, C., Kemp-Benedict, E., & Nilsson, M. (2022). Governance in the water-energy-food nexus: Gaps and future research needs. Stockholm Environment Institute.
Weitz, N., Strambo, C., Kemp-Benedict, E., & Rockström, J. (2017). Towards a Nexus Approach to Food Systems. Environmental Science & Policy, 67, 34-47.
Zarrintab, M. , Pourebrahim, S. & Moinaddini, M. (2024). Utilizing Network Analysis to Evaluate the Water-Energy-Food Governance System in the Context of the Seventh Development Plan. Journal of Range and Watershed Managment, 77(2), 191-207. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrwm.2024.369079.1737

  • Receive Date 23 March 2025
  • Revise Date 03 May 2025
  • Accept Date 27 May 2025