Integrated Watershed Management

Integrated Watershed Management

Social network analysis of rangeland stakeholders in Robat village, Khorasan Razavi Province

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Range and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran
2 Department of Range and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Deputy of Water and Environment Research Institute, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran
3 M.Sc., expert at Innovative Ecosystem Company, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract
Extended Abstract
Introduction: Social network analysis plays a pivotal role in decision-making across diverse management levels within natural resource programs, particularly in the intricate landscapes of rangelands. Its significance lies in unraveling complex social interactions and relationships, providing indispensable insights for comprehensive decision-making. Robat village in Khorasan-Razavi province stands out as a crucial focal point for this study, confronting an array of human and ecological challenges. Despite its ecological and environmental importance, the village has yet to undergo a thorough examination concerning social-ecological system analysis. This research aims to bridge this gap by scrutinizing the intricate web of social relationships within Robat village, placing specific emphasis on evaluating the influential role played by local authorities in fostering cooperation and participation in the management and protection of rangelands.
Materials and methods: Establishing a robust foundation for understanding the socio-ecological system within Robat village involved meticulous field studies, survey methods, and participatory observation. This comprehensive approach allowed for the precise delineation of socio-ecological boundaries and the identification of stakeholders within Robat village's customary system. Data collection incorporated a meticulously designed researcher-made network analysis questionnaire. This questionnaire was purposefully crafted to solicit nuanced information on the bonds of trust and participation among rangeland users, providing a detailed and insightful understanding of the complex social fabric within the community. Applying matrix algebra theory facilitated intricate mathematical calculations within the network analysis method. The utilization of Ucinet v6.191 software enabled the execution of these calculations, with the collected data matrix serving as a fundamental tool for deriving and evaluating crucial indicators.
Results and Discussion: Analysis of the results uncovered a density index of 22.79% in the partnership link and 13.97% in the trust link, indicating a noteworthy yet moderate density in both connections. Further exploration revealed the degree of reciprocity in participation and trust links, standing at 51.42% and 37.5%, respectively. These percentages underscore the mutual nature inherent within these relationships, emphasizing the interconnectedness of participants. Additionally, the network size index shed light on the robustness of the network, highlighting 35 and 24 links within the Robat local stakeholders' network based on participation and trust links, respectively. Significantly, the density among central actors surpassed that among peripheral ones, elucidating the strategic placement of key and influential individuals within the network's central subgroups. This centralization contributes significantly to the heightened social cohesion observed within the community, fostering a conducive environment for effective collaboration.
Conclusion: This research not only addresses an existing gap in the field of social network analysis but also enriches the understanding of the establishment of a social-ecological system within Robat village. By delving into the communication patterns among rangeland users, the study unveils a multifaceted social system that encompasses the residents of the village, the local economy, infrastructure, and technology. These elements collectively act as drivers influencing the rural community's dynamics, shaping its response to challenges and fostering resilience and adaptation. Simultaneously, the rural community coexists within the broader rangelands ecosystem, where external factors such as climate change, drought, fires, and floods exert influences on vegetation, biodiversity, and water resources. Furthermore, the reciprocal relationship between the social and ecological systems is further mediated through institutions and management practices, emphasizing the intricate balance needed for adaptive governance and management. This interplay necessitates a nuanced analysis of the relationship between humans and rangelands, stressing the importance of adaptive strategies for sustainable development. In conclusion, this study offers valuable insights into the intricate social dynamics within Robat village, providing a foundation for informed decision-making and sustainable resource management. The presented findings serve as a stepping stone for future research and policy interventions, contributing to the broader understanding of social-ecological systems in rangeland environments.
Keywords
Subjects

Afrakhteh, H., A. Tahmasebi, F. Azizpour. & F. Askari. (2017). On the Analysis of Structural Pattern of Institutional Relations in the Governance of Agricultural Water Resources (Case Study: Rasht County). Journal of Planning studies of human settlements, 12(5), 2–39. http://jshsp.iaurasht.ac.ir  (In Persian)
Bastani, S. & M. Raeisi. (2012). Social Network Analysis as a Method: Using Whole Network Approach for Studying FOSS Communities. Journal of Iranian Social Studies, 14(2). http://www.jssisa.ir/article_21463.html?lang=fa  (In Persian)
Bodin, O. & Crona, B. (2009). The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference. Journal of Global Environmental Change. 19(3), 366–374. http://doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05
Bodin, O. & Prell, C. (2011). Social networks and natural resource management: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Bordons, M., Aparicio, J., González-Albo, B. & Díaz-Faes, A. (2015). The relationship between the research performance of scientists and their position in co-authorship networks in three fields. Journal of Informetrics. 9(1), 135–144. http://doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.12.001
Bruggeman, J. (2013). Social networks: An introduction. Routledge press.
Burt, R.S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110 (2): 349-399. http://doi:10.1086/421787
Dutta, A. & Das, S. (2020). Adoption of grid-connected solar rooftop systems in the state of Jammu and Kashmir: A stakeholder analysis. Energy Policy, 140, 111382. http://doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111382
Ebrahimi, F., Ghorbani, M., Salajegheh, A. & Mohseni Saravi, M. (2014). Social Network Analysis of Local Stakeholders in Action Plan for Water Resources Co-Management (Case study: Jajrood River in Latian watershed, Darbandsar village). Iran- Watershed management science Engineering. 8(25), 47-56. http://jwmsei.ir/article-1-399-en.html  (In Persian)
Ghorbani, M., Ebrahimi, F., Salajegheh, A., Mohsenisaravi, M. (2015) Social Network Analysis, Social Power and the Key Stakeholders in Action Plan for Water Resources Co-Management (Case study: Jajrood River in Latian watershed, Darbandsar village). Jwmseir. 9(28), 21-32. http://jwmsei.ir/article-1-502-fa.html 
Firouzroz, M., Erfanzadeh, R., Ghorbani, M. & Rasekhi, S. (2015). Social network analysis and structural scheme of social relation among rangeland stakeholders (Case study: Takor village, Noor). Journal of Rangeland, 9(3), 244-254. http://rangelandsrm.ir/article-1-258-fa.html
Ghorbani, M. (2012). The role of social networks in operation mechanisms of Rangeland (Case Study: Taleghan area), Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Natural Resources, Tehran University, 430 pages. (In Persian)
Ghorbani, M. (2014a). Stakeholder and social powers analysis and social network in natural resources Comanagement. Iranian Journal of Range and Watershed management, 1(67). https://doi.org/10.22059/jrwm.2014.50835  (In Persian)
Ghorbani, M., Salari, F., Saeidigarghani, H., Sanaei, A. (2015a). Analysis of Trust and Participatory Management by Users Network in Toward Rangelands Co-management (Case study: Gorgoo region- Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad province). Rangeland, 9(2), 194-182.
http://rangelandsrm.ir/article-1-197-fa.html
Ghorbani, M., Rahimi, K., Jafari, M & Tavili, A. (2015b). Analyzing the social capital in rangeland stakeholders network for adaptive co-management (ACM). Journal of Rangeland, 9 (1), 91-105. (In Persian)
Ghorbani, M. (2015c). An action plan for monitoring and assessment of sociopolitical networks in empowering local communities and comprehensive territory management. Tehran, Iran: Research Institution of Local Communities Empowerment and Cooperation Management of Natural Resources. (In Persian)
Ghorbani, M., Jafarian, V., Yazdani, M. R. & Abdolshahnejad, M. (2016). Analysis of Policy Network and Organizational Cohesion of the Stakeholders of Natural Resources of Semnan Province. Journal of Range and Watershed Management69(1), 155-166. http://doi.10.22059/jrwm.2016.61740 
Ghorbani, M., Avazpour, L. & Siramirad, M. (2018). An Analysis and Assessment of Intergroup Social Capital toward Rural Sustainable Development (Case Study: Kerman Province, Rigan County). Quarterly of Social Studies and Research in Iran7(1), 1-23. http://doi.10.22059/jisr.2018.135399.288 
Hahn, T., P. Olsson, C. Folke, & k. Johnsson. (2006). Trust – building, Knowledge Generation and Organization Innovations: The Role of a Bridging Organization for Adaptive Co-Management of a Wetland Landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden. Human Ecology, 34(4), 573-592. http://doi.10.1007/s10745-006-9035-z
Hanneman, R.A. & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. University of California Riverside, California.
Jannatichenar, M. A., Kolahi, M. & Mesdaghi, M. (2020). Social Conflicts and Rangeland Management: A Case Study at Rangelands of Kalatnader County, Iran. Iranian Journal of Applied Ecology, 9(3), 77-97. (In Persian)
Jatel, N. (2013). Using social network analysis to make invisible human actor water governance networks visible – the case of the Okanagan vallay. A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of master of arts in the college of graduate studies (Interdisciplinary Studies) the University of British Columbia
Kolahi, M., Davary, K. & Omranian Khorasani, H. (2024). Integrated Approach to Water Resource Management in Mashhad Plain, Iran: Actor Analysis, Cognitive Mapping, and Roadmap Development. Scientific Reports. 14, 162. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50697-x
Kolahi, M. (2019). Environmental Knowledge: From Wisdom to Capability. Agricultural Education Research Publications, Tehran, 159 pp. (In Persian)
Kolahi, M (2021). Natural Resources Stakeholders. Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 8 (1), 19-30
Leahy, E. & Anderson, H. (2008). Trust Factors in Community–water Resources Management Agency Relationships. Journal of Landscape and Urban Planning, 87(2), 100–107. http://doi.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008
Lienert, J., Schnetzer, F. & Ingold, K. (2013). Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes. Journal of Environmental Management, 12(5), 134-148. http://doi.10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.0
Plickert, G., Cˆot´e, R.R & Wellman, B. (2007). It’s not who you know, it’s how you know them: Who exchanges what with whom? Social Networks. 29(3), 405-429. http://doi10.1016/j.socnet.2007.01.00
Rasekhi, s. (2014). Social network analysis in policy and planning participatory rangeland management (Case study: Fars Province), thesis, Department of Natural Resources, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research. (In Persian)
Rahimi Balkanlou, Kh., Ghorbani, M., Jafari, M. & Tavili, A. (2014). Analysis of the local stakeholders' network, social capital and cohesion in landscape co-management (Case study: Changi rangeland- Kalateh Roudbar- Damghan), Journal of Watershed Management Research (Pajouhesh- va Sazandegi). (In Persian)
Ramezani, A. & Mirzamohamadi, A. (2013). Social network analysis: along with Ucinet software training, 20 p. (In Persian)
Rowe, G. & Frewer, J. (2005). A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms, Science Technology Human Values, 30(2), 251-290. http://doi.10.1177/0162243904271724
Salari, F., 2015. modelling and Analysis of water resources governance network in catchment (case study: Razin catchment in Kermanshah province). thesis, Department of Natural Resources. Tehran University. 218 pages. (In Persian)
Salimi Koochi, J., Selajgeh, A., Malikian, A & Rezaei, A. (2019). The analysis of structural pattern of inside group social capital of water resources beneficiaries (case study: Doroodzan downstream Watershed, Fars). Scientific-Research Journal of Marte' and Abkhizdari, 73(3), 499-511. (In Persian)
Suyo, J. G. B., Le Masson, V., Shaxson, L., Luhan, M. R. J., & Hurtado, A. Q. (2020). A social network analysis of the Philippine seaweed farming industry: Unravelling the web. Marine Policy. 118, 104007. http://doi.10.1016/j.marpol.2020.10400
Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook. CA: Sage, Newbury Park
Scholz, R.W. (2011). Environmental Literacy in Science and Society: From Knowledge to Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 631.
Payeste, M., Kolahi, M. & Omranian Khorasani, H. (2020). Criteria and Indicators; Requirement for Applying and Evaluating Good Governance in Natural Resources. Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 7(1), 95-102. (In Persian)
Paieste, M., Kolahi, M. & Omranian Khorasani, H. (2022). Promoting Natural Resource Management with an Emphasis on Good Governance. Journal of Rangeland, 16(1), 124-139. (In Persian)
Prell, C., Hubacek, K. & Reed, M. (2009). Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Journal of Society and Natural Resources. 22(6), 501–518. http://doi.10.1080/08941920802199202

  • Receive Date 25 January 2024
  • Revise Date 17 February 2024
  • Accept Date 12 March 2024