Integrated Watershed Management

Integrated Watershed Management

Comparison of the efficiency of sediment rating curve and learning models for estimating suspended sediment load in karst rivers (Case study: Hydrometric stations of Khorram Abad, Alshatar and Biranshahr watersheds)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Department of Range and Watershed Enggineiring, Faculty of Natural Resources, Lorestan University, Lorestan, Iran
Abstract
Extended Abstract
Introduction: Sediment transport by surface flows is one of the primary processes responsible for reshaping the Earth's surface. This process is widely expressed in the shape of river drainage systems and their alluvial deposits, which dominate the geomorphology of large areas of the Earth's surface and are responsible for the majority of sediment from land to oceans. One of the most important problems threatening dams is the sediment inputs to the dam reservoir. Due to various problems, estimating the volume of sediments is a complicated process. So, some methods have been created by researchers to overcome these problems. Modeling of suspended sediment load (SSL) is an important subject for decision-makers in the catchment. Accurate and reliable modeling of SSL is one of the important subjects for planning, managing, and designing soil and water structures in the drainage networks. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficiency of Sediment Rating Curve (SRC) and Machine Learning Algorithms (MLA) for estimating SSL in karst rivers in Bahram Joo, Cham Anjir, Sarab Seyd Ali, and Kakareza hydrometric stations in Lorestan province, Iran.
Materials and Methods: In this study, a rating curve and five soft computing techniques, Support Vector Machine with RBF kernel (SVM-RBF), Support Vector Machine with PUK kernel (SVM-PUK), Gaussian processes with PUK kernel (GP-PUK), Gaussian processes with RBF kernel (GP-RBF), M5P, reduced error pruning tree (REPTree), and Random Forest (RF) were used and evaluated. They were used to predict SSL in the Kashkan watershed, Iran. Cham Anjir, Bahram Joo, Sarb Seyd Ali, and Kakareza stations were selected for this study. The data of temperature, rain, discharge, and SSL of 20 years (2001–2021) were utilized as input and output parameters. Thus, four stations with a long-term data were selected. The total dataset consists of temperature, rain, discharge, and SSL of watersheds, of which 70% of the data were used for training and 30% for the testing phase. Finally, the models’ accuracy was assessed using three performance evaluation parameters: Correlation Coefficient (C.C.), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and Maximum Absolute Error (MAE).
Results and Discussion: Results showed that the soft computing methods (SVM-PUK, GP-PUK, GP-RBF, M5P, REPTree, and RF) performed better than the traditional technique (SRC), as they made use of non-linear techniques for data reconstruction. It can be concluded that, among all the models, the M5P model, which used decomposed data that captured the dynamic features of the non-linear and non-stationary SSL time series data, performed better than other models. The SRC performed with a C.C of 0.5941. The best M5P model (best among soft computing methods) scored a mean C.C of about 0.89, surpassing the best SRC results. Although it captured the peaks better than SRC, it still overestimated the sediment load and was unable to capture the peak sediment rates, which are of great importance for design purposes.
Conclusion: Sediments carried by water are a serious problem, as they shorten the life of a reservoir, reduce the channel discharge-carrying capacity, especially to tail-end users, etc. Therefore, sediment management is the golden rule in river engineering, to which much effort and energy are directed. An important aspect of sediment management is sediment estimation, which is mostly found in a suspended form in rivers and other water bodies. This research focused on a comparison of the different methods of suspended sediment estimation in rivers. This includes the traditional method, i.e., SRC, and soft computing techniques, i.e., SVM-RBF, SVM-PUK, GP-PUK, GP-RBF, M5P, REPTree, and RF. The results of this study provide scientific information to predict SSL, and Soft Computing Techniques could be an efficient technique to simulate the SSL time series, because they extract key features embedded in the SSL signal. Finally, the results showed that the M5P model is effective in predicting suspended sediment content in the KhorammAbad, Biranshahr, and Alashter watersheds.
Keywords

Subjects


Ahmadi, H. )2000(. Applied Geomorphology (V.1, Water Erosion). Tehran University Publications, 688. (In Persian)
Beiranvand, N., Sepahvand, A. & Haghizadeh, A. (2023). Suspended sediment load modeling by machine learning algorithms in low and high discharge periods. Water and Soil Management and Modeling, 3(2), 50-66 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22098/mmws.2022.11262.1115 
Bonakdar, L. & Etemad Shahidi, A. (2011). Predicting wave run-up on rubble-mound structures using M5 model tree. Ocean Engineering, (38), 111-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.09.015
Breiman, L. (1996). Bagging predictors. Machin Learning, 24(2), 123–140.
Farrokhzadeh, B., Azarakhshi, M., Mahdavi, M. & Selajgah, A. (2008). Regional survey of sediment gauge curve in different climates of Iran. Journal of Faculty of Natural Resources, 61(1), 1-12 (In Persian).
Girolamo, A.M.D., Pillo, R.D., Porto, A.L., Todisco, M.T. & Barca, E. (2018). Identifying a reliable method for estimating suspended sediment load in a temporary river system. CATENA, 165, 442-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.02.015
Honrabakhsh A., Niazi A., Soltani Kopaei S. & Tahmasabi P. (2018). Modeling the relationship between sedimentation rate and hydrological and environmental characteristics of the basin. Quantitative Geomorphology Research, 8(1), 117-197(In Persian).
Hostache, R., Hissler, C., Matgen, P., Guignard, C. & Bates, P. (2014). Modelling suspended-sediment propagation and related heavy metal contamination in floodplains: a parameter sensitivity analysis. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18(9), 3539-3551. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3539-2014
Ildam, A.R. & Panah, M. (2021). Optimizing the most suitable model for estimating the suspended sediment of Hamedan's Shineh Dam River. Hydrogeomorphology, 8(27), 37-57. https://doi.org/10.22034/GMPJ.2020.122214
Javidan, S., Taghi Sattari, M., Karimzadeh, P. & Mehrabi, A. (2022). Performance Analysis of Hydrological and Data Based models in Estimation of Suspended Sediment Rate. Environment and Water Engineering, 8(2), 468-480. https://doi.org/10.22034/jewe.2021.305599.1632
Jung, B.M., Fernandes, E.H., Möller, O.J. & García-Rodríguez, F. (2020). Estimating Suspended Sediment Concentrations from River Discharge Data for Reconstructing Gaps of Information of Long-Term Variability Studies. Water, 12(9), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092382
Kumar, S. & Rastogi, R.A. (1987). A conceptual catchment model for estimating suspended sediment flow. Journal of Hydrology, 95,155-163. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0022-1694(87)90122-3
Mirzaei, M.R., Arab Khodri, M., Faiz Nia, S. & Ahmadi, H. (2005). Comparison of estimation methods of suspended sediment in rivers. Iranian Journal of Natural Resources, 58(2), 301-315(In Persian).
Moradinezhad, A., Davoodmaghami, D. & Moradi, M. (2020). Investigating the effectiveness of methods for estimating the suspended sediment load of Qara Chai River. Journal of Biology and Water Engineering, 5(4), 328-338. https://doi: 10.22034/jewe.2020.211925.1341
Naseri, F., Azari, M. & Dasarani, M.T. (2020). Optimizing the coefficients of the sediment gauge equation using genetic algorithm. Scientific-Research Quarterly of Irrigation and Water Engineering, 9(35), 82-98.
Nourani , V., Gokcekus , H. & Gelete , G. (2020). Estimation of suspended sediment load using artificial intelligence-based ensemble model. Hindawi Complexity, 19 pages. https://doi: 10.1155/2021/6633760
Pal, M. (2005). Random forest classifier for remote sensing classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(1), 217-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160412331269698
Pal, M. & Deswal, S. (2010). Modelling pile capacity using Gaussian process regression. Computer. Geotechnical, 37, 942-947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2010.07.012
Prasad, A.M., Iverson, L.R. & Liaw, A. (2006). Newer classification and regression tree techniques: Bagging and random forests for ecological prediction. Ecosystems, 9(2), 181-199.
Quinlan, J.R. (1992). Learning with continuous classes. in Proceedings of the 5th Australian joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Hobart 16-18 November, 343-348
Ampomah, R., Hosseiny, H., Zhang, L., Smith, V. & Sample-Lord, K. (2020). A Regression-Based Prediction Model of Suspended Sediment Yield in the Cuyahoga River in Ohio Using Historical Satellite Images and Precipitation Data. Water, 12(881), 1-18. https://doi.10.3390/w12030881
Rovira, A., Alcaraz, C. & Ibanez, C. (2012). Spatial and temporal dynamics of suspended load at-acrosssection: The lowermost Ebro River, Water Research, 46(11), 3671-3681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.04.014
Samadianfard, S., Salarifar, M., Javidan, S. & Mikaeili, F. (2020). Estimation of Daily Reference Evapotranspiration in Humid Climates Using Data-Driven Methods of Gaussian Process Regression, Support Vector Regression and Random Forest. Environment and Water Engineering, 6(4), 360-373(In Persian).  https://doi.org/10.22034/jewe.2020.241690.1394
Satari, M.T., Rezazadeh Joodi, A., Safdari, F. & Ghahremanzadeh, F. (2016). Evaluation of the performance of M5 tree model and support vector regression methods in river suspended sediment modeling. Journal of water and soil resources protection, 6(1), 109-123.
Sepahvand, A., Sihag, P., Singh, B. & Zand, M. (2018). Comparative evaluation of infiltration models. KSCE Journal, 22, 4173–4184. https://doi.10.1007/s12205-018-1347-1
Sepehvand, A., Nazari Samani, A., Mohammadian, H., Ahmadi, H. & Faiz Nia, S. (2020). Seasonal changes of dissolved sediment and determining the dissolution rate of calcareous formations. Watershed Science and Engineering of Iran. 14(48), 21-32 (In Persian). https://doi.org/ 20.1001.1.20089554.1399.14.48.4.1
Sepehvand, A. & Azizi Najafkali, Z. (2019). Suspended sediment modeling using Gaussian process and multi-layer perceptron models. 15th National conference on Watershed Management Sciences and Engineering of Iran, 15, 1-6 (in Persian).
Shahinejad, B., Shahrokhi, S.H. & Yousefi, H. (2022). Estimation of suspended sediment using M5 non-parametric models and multivariate spline adaptive regression (MARS). Journal of Irrigation and Water Engineering of Iran, 46, 16-34. https://doi.org/10.22125/IWE.2021.142020
Sutter, R., Verhoeven, R. & Krein, R. (2001). Simulation of sediment transport during flood events, labratoary work and field experiments. Hydrological Sciences, 46(4), 599-610. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626660109492853
Taleb Bidokhti, N., Shahoui S., Behnia A., Behbodhi F., Sadeghi S.H.R., Malek A. & Sharifi F. (2003). Specialized Culture of Erosion and Sedimentation. UNESCO Publications, 999 pp (In Persian).
Varwani, J., Faiz-nia, S., Mahdavi, M. & Arab Khodri, M. (2002). Regional analysis of suspended sediment using regression equation in Gorgan River watershed. Journal of Natural Resources of Iran, 55(1), 35-47 (In Persian).
Wang, Y. & Witten, I.H. (1997). Inducing model trees for continuous classes. Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Machine Learning. Prague, Czech Republic: Springer.
Yang, D., Zhang, X., Pan R., Wang, Y. & Chen, Z. (2018). A novel Gaussian process regression model for state-of-health estimation of lithium-ion battery using charging curve. Journal of Power Sources, 384, 387-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.03.015
Zhang, W., Wei, X., Zheng, J., Zhu, Y. & Zhang, Y. (2012). Estimating suspended sediment loads in the Pearl River Delta region using sediment rating curves. Geomorphology, 185, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2012.02.017
Zoratipour, A., Mahdavi, M., Khaliqi Sigaroudi, S., Seljakeh, A.F. & Shamsalmaali N. (2008). Investigating the effect of sediment classification on the improvement of hydrological methods of extracting the suspended load of rivers. Journal of Faculty of Natural Resources, 44, 819-809(In Persian).
Zounemat-Kermani, M., Kişi, Ö., Adamowski, J. & Ramezani Charmahineh, A. (2016). Evaluation of data driven models for river suspended sediment concentration modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 535, 457-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.012

  • Receive Date 13 December 2023
  • Revise Date 19 January 2024
  • Accept Date 06 March 2024