Integrated Watershed Management

Integrated Watershed Management

Integration of multi-criteria decision models and recreation opportunity spectrum in the mapping of recreational ecosystem service in Semnan Province

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Fatemeh Mohammadyari 1
Ardavan Zarandian 2
Roya Mousazadeh 3
1 Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
2 Research Group of Environmental Assessment and Risk, Research Center for Environment and Sustainable Development (RCESD), Department of Environment, Tehran, Iran.
3 Research Group of Environmental Economics, Research Center for Environment and Sustainable Development (RCESD) Department of Environment, Tehran, Iran.
10.22034/iwm.2024.2020228.1125
Abstract
Extended Abstract
Introduction: With the rapid development of society, economy and population growth, the impact of human activities on ecosystems is increasing, which has caused the relationship between human well-being and ecosystem to be in the spotlight. To that end, ecosystem services as an essential element for human development and survival emphasizes the benefits that natural ecosystems provide to humans. These services are divided into four categories based on the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA): provision, regulation, support and cultural. Cultural ecosystem services are important component of ecosystem services that refer to intangible benefits of the human beings from ecosystems and play an essential role in enhancing human well-being. Cultural ecosystem services can include the use of natural resources directly or indirectly.
Materials and Methods: The present study was conducted with the aim of modeling recreation services in Semnan province. For this purpose, the integration of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) of one as the multicriteria decision-making methods and the recreation opportunity spectrum (ROS) model was used. In the ROS model, recreational service is estimated based on recreation potential index and accessibility- remoteness index. In the recreation potential index, three elements: the degree of naturalness, the protected regions, and the attractiveness of water bodies, and in the accessibility- remoteness index, the distance from roads and human-made areas were mapped. In this research, Sentinel-2 satellite images were used to prepare the land use map of 2021. Then, using the maximum likelihood algorithm, land use maps were prepared in 18 classes.
Results and Discussion: According to the land use map, pastures, barren lands and rainfed agriculture have the highest levels of land use in the studied area with 23.57, 22.27 and 17.31% respectively. After that, waterbodies, salt marshes and irrigated agriculture are the dominant land uses with 15.65, 10.98 and 7.84%, respectively. It is worth mentioning that the smallest area of the region is dedicated to wetlands and urban uses. Based on the results, Forest and pasture areas have the highest potential in providing recreation services in the study area. It was also seen that, the third category (low provision- difficult access) and the seventh category (high provision- easy access) respectively have the highest and lowest land surface coverage in terms of the provision of recreational ecosystem services in the province. Overall, the results showed that recreation ecosystem service is affected by various factors caused by human development, especially land cover/use changes. Considering the concentration of both variables of ecosystem service provision and urban and industrial development in the northern half of the province, it is vital to pay attention to the conflicts between the development and management of ecosystem services. If this is ignored, in addition to intensifying the instability of development, the destruction of natural assets of the province, especially forests and pastures, which are the main source of provision of various ecosystem services such as recreation, will intensify.
Conclusion: In general, the results indicate that most of the places in the province have a medium to low ability to provide recreation services. Considering that recreational potential is important for the well-being of urban populations, increasing urban parks and green infrastructure areas is a useful way to improve the quality of the recreational experience. Therefore, urban development strategies should increasingly aim to strengthen the natural and artificial network of green space, diversity of plant compositions and biomass structure, and proper management of green space. This is necessary for the design of green space with regard to maximizing ecosystem services in Semnan province.
Keywords
Ecosystem services
Recreation
Analytic Hierarchy Process
land use
Semnan
Aşılıoğlu, F. & Çay, R. D. (2023). A dual spatial analysis method based on recreation opportunity spectrum and analytical hierarchy process for outdoor recreation site suitability. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 44, 100703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2023.100703   
Banela, M. & Kitsiou, D. (2023). Mapping cultural ecosystem services: A case study in Lesvos Island, Greece. Ocean & Coastal Management, 246, 106883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106883  
Chaharahy, Z., Pourebrahim, S. & Pejmman, A. H. (2022). Spatial Analysis and Prioritization of Cultural Ecosystem Services: Modeling the Suitability of Recreational Services. Town and Country Planning, 14(1), 317-345. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22059/jtcp.2021.330707.670255
Früh-Müller, A., Hotes, S., Breuer, L., Wolters, V. & Koellner, T. (2016). Regional patterns of ecosystem services in cultural landscapes. Land, 5(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/land5020017
Grzyb, T. (2024). Mapping cultural ecosystem services of the urban riverscapes: the case of the Vistula River in Warsaw, Poland. Ecosystem Services, 65, 101584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101584
González-García, A., Palomo, I., González, J. A., López, C. A. & Montes, C. (2020). Quantifying spatial supply-demand mismatches in ecosystem services provides insights for land-use planning. Land use policy, 94, 104493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104493
Gugulica, M. & Burghardt, D. (2023). Mapping indicators of cultural ecosystem services use in urban green spaces based on text classification of geosocial media data. Ecosystem Services, 60, 101508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101508
Han, R., Feng, C. C., Xu, N. & Guo, L. (2020). Spatial heterogeneous relationship between ecosystem services and human disturbances: A case study in Chuandong, China. Science of The Total Environment, 721, 137818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137818 
Huang, S., Tian, T., Zhai, L., Deng, L. & Che, Y. (2023). Understanding the dynamic changes in wetland cultural ecosystem services: Integrating annual social media data into the SolVES. Applied Geography, 156, 102992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.102992
Kienast, F., Degenhardt, B., Weilenmann, B., Waeger, Y. & Buchecker, M. (2012). GIS-assisted mapping of landscape suitability for nearby recreation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105, 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01.015
Kosanic, A., Lambers, K., Galata, S., Kothieringer, K. & Abderhalden, A. (2023). Importance of Cultural Ecosystem Services for Cultural Identity and Wellbeing in the Lower Engadine, Switzerland. Land, 12(12), 2156. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12122156
Lavorel, S., Rey, P. L., Grigulis, K., Zawada, M. & Byczek, C. (2020). Interactions between outdoor recreation and iconic terrestrial vertebrates in two French alpine national parks. Ecosystem Services, 45, 101155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101155
Guo, R.Z., Song, Y.B. & Dong, M. (2022). A review and prospect of cultural ecosystem services of urban wetlands. Hangzhou Normal Univ. 21, 364–371.
Guo, R. Z., Lin, L., Xu, J. F., Dai, W. H., Song, Y. B. & Dong, M. (2023). Spatio-temporal characteristics of cultural ecosystem services and their relations to landscape factors in Hangzhou Xixi National Wetland Park, China. Ecological Indicators, 154, 110910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110910
Maes, J., Paracchini, M.L., Zulian, G., Dunbar, M.B. & Alkemade, R. (2012). Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biological Conservation, 155, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.016
Martin-Lopez, B., Leister, I., Lorenzo Cruz, P., Palomo, I., Grêt-Regamey, A., Harrison, P. A., Lavorel, S., Locatelli, B., Luque, S. & Walz, A. (2019). Nature’s contributions to people in mountains: A review. PloS one, 14(6), e0217847. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217847
Márquez, L. A. M., Rezende, E. C. N., Machado, K. B., do Nascimento, E. L. M., Castro, J. D. A. B. & Nabout, J. C. (2023). Trends in valuation approaches for cultural ecosystem services: A systematic literature review. Ecosystem Services, 64, 101572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101572
Mohammadyari, F., Tavakoli, M., Zarandian, A. & Abdollahi, S. (2023a). Optimization land use based on multi-scenario simulation of ecosystem service for sustainable landscape planning in a mixed urban-Forest watershed. Ecological Modelling, 483, 110440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110440
Mohammadyari, F., Zarandian, A., Mirsanjari, M. M., Suziedelyte Visockiene, J. & Tumeliene, E. (2023b). Modelling Impact of Urban Expansion on Ecosystem Services: A Scenario-Based Approach in a Mixed Natural/Urbanised Landscape. Land, 12(2), 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020291
Quevedo, J. M. D. & Kohsaka, R. (2024). A systematic review of cultural ecosystem services of blue carbon ecosystems: Trends, gaps, and challenges in Asia and beyond. Marine Policy, 159, 105898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105898
Ryngnga, P. K. (2008). Ecotourism prioritization: A geographic information system approach. South Asian Journal of Tourism and Heritage, 1, 50-56
Sun, X., Crittenden, J. C., Li, F., Lu, Z. & Dou, X. (2018). Urban expansion simulation and the spatio-temporal changes of ecosystem services, a case study in Atlanta Metropolitan area, USA. Science of the Total Environment, 622, 974-987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.062
Sun, X. & Li, F. (2017). Spatiotemporal assessment and trade-offs of multiple ecosystem services based on land use changes in Zengcheng, China. Science of the total environment, 609, 1569-1581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.221
Sun, Y., Liu, D. & Wang, P. (2022). Urban simulation incorporating coordination relationships of multiple ecosystem services. Sustainable Cities and Society, 76, 103432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103432
Sen, S. & Guchhait, S. K. (2021). Urban green space in India: Perception of cultural ecosystem services and psychology of situatedness and connectedness. Ecological Indicators, 123, 107338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107338
Shi, X., Zhao, X., Pu, J., Gu, Z., Zhao, Q., Feng, Y. & Zhou, S. (2024). Creating a monetization-SolVES model to visualize the cultural ecosystem services for promoting landscape conservation. Journal for Nature Conservation, 77, 126521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2023.126521
Teoh, S. H. S., Symes, W. S., Sun, H., Pienkowski, T. & Carrasco, L. R. (2019). A global meta-analysis of the economic values of provisioning and cultural ecosystem services. Science of the Total Environment, 649, 1293-1298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.422
Vallecillo, S., La Notte, A., Zulian, G., Ferrini, S. & Maes, J. (2019). Ecosystem services accounts: Valuing the actual flow of nature-based recreation from ecosystems to people. Ecological Modelling, 392, 196-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.09.023
Wang, Y. & Hayashi, K. (2023). Methodological development of cultural ecosystem services evaluation using location data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 396, 136523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136523
Wang, L., Huang, L., Cao, W., Zhai, J. & Fan, J. (2024). Assessing grassland cultural ecosystem services supply and demand for promoting the sustainable realization of grassland cultural values. Science of The Total Environment, 169255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169255
Yang, L. & Cao, K. (2022). Spatial matching and correlation between recreation service supply and demand in the Ili River Valley, China. Applied Geography, 148, 102805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102805
Yohannes, H., Soromessa, T., Argaw, M. & Dewan, A. (2021). Spatio-temporal changes in habitat quality and linkage                          with landscape characteristics in the Beressa watershed, Blue Nile basin of Ethiopian highlands. Journal of Environmental Management, 281, 111885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111885
Zarandian, A. (2023). Economic valuation of the basic resources of Semnan province with the approach of preparing an ecosystem service map. Research Center for Environment and Sustainable Development (RCESD). Research Project
Zulian, G., Paracchini, M. L., Maes, J. & Liquete, C. (2013). ESTIMAP: Ecosystem services mapping at European scale. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembou.

  • Receive Date 13 January 2024
  • Revise Date 24 February 2024
  • Accept Date 29 February 2024