Integrated Watershed Management

Integrated Watershed Management

Performance Evaluation of Two General Circulation Models for Downscaling Average Temperature in Birjand County

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Department of Water Sciences and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran
Abstract
Extended abstract
Introduction: Climate change has a significant impact on water resources and the environment, which is reflected in agriculture, society, and economy. The use of General Circulation Models (GCMs) with downscaling models is a method for assessing climate change. Considering the placement of South Khorasan Province and the city of Birjand in the arid region of Iran, population growth, industrial and mining development, and the pursuit of sustainable agriculture, it is essential to assess the effects of climate change on essential meteorological parameters. The objective of this study is to compare the performance of historical models NCEP and ECMWF in downscaling temperature parameters for the Birjand County and investigate the changes in this parameter until 2030 using the top model and the SSP245 scenario with the CanESM5 model.
Materials and Methods: In this research, to compare the performance of two GCMs, NCEP and ECMWF, in downscaling temperature parameters, daily temperature data from the Birjand synoptic station for the period from 1990 to 2021 were used as the baseline period. Additionally, to evaluate the performance of these two GCMs, the statistical downscaling model SDSM was utilized. To assess the performance of these two models, evaluation criteria such as NS, KGE, RMSE, and BR2 were employed.
Results and Discussion: To investigate and compare the performance of two GCMs, NCEP and ECMWF, daily average temperature data from the Birjand synoptic station were used from the January 1990 to the September 2021. The data from 1990 to the January 2008 were considered for calibration, and data from the January 2008 to the September 2015 were used for validation. Both NCEP and ECMWF models had 26 parameters, and for downscaling, the parameters with the highest correlation with observed temperature were selected among these 26 parameters using the R software and the HydroGof package. Additionally, evaluation criteria such as NS, RMSE, KGE, and BR2 were used to assess the models' performance in calibration and validation sections. The closeness of variance and mean values of time series generated by the NCEP and ECMWF models to the variance and mean values of observed time series in the entire simulation period was examined using F and T tests. The results of the calibration section showed that the two models, NCEP and ECMWF, exhibited similar performance since the values of evaluation criteria NS, RMSE, KGE, and BR2 for the ECMWF model were calculated as 0.69, 4.86, 0.85, and 0.7, respectively, and for the NCEP model, they were 0.70, 4.79, 0.85, and 0.7, respectively. Since box plots, mean values, and standard deviations have a high capability in deciding the degree of dispersion and similarity between two time series, box plots, mean values, and standard deviations of the generated time series and observed time series in the calibration and validation periods were used to assess the similarity and closeness of the time series. The results of the evaluation criteria in the validation section showed that the ECMWF model outperformed the NCEP model, with values of evaluation criteria NS, RMSE, KGE, and BR2 for the ECMWF model being calculated as 0.69, 4.9, 0.85, and 0.73, respectively, and for the NCEP model, 0.67, 5.3, 0.83, and 0.7, respectively. Overall, the results indicated that the ECMWF model had a better performance and was selected as the superior model. Therefore, to simulate and predict the average temperature parameter, the parameters mslp, P500, P5-f, P5-u, P850, and P8-u from the ECMWF model were used. Consequently, it is predicted that the average temperature will increase by approximately 3 degrees Celsius compared to the statistical baseline period in the next 8 years.
Conclusion: The results indicate that based on the evaluation criteria, the ECMWF model performs relatively better in estimating the average temperature of Birjand County compared to the NCEP model. Moreover, the analysis of box plots, mean values, and standard deviations of the generated time series in the calibration and validation sections showed that both models produced similar patterns of dispersion, minimum, maximum, and mean values compared to the observed time series. However, the ECMWF model exhibited relatively better performance in terms of mean and variance values of the generated data on a monthly basis in the calibration and validation periods. As a result, the ECMWF model was selected as the superior model for simulating and predicting the average temperature of Birjand County for the years 2022 to 2030 under the SSP245 emission scenario using the CanESM5 model. The predicted results indicate that the average temperature of Birjand County is expected to increase by approximately 3 degrees Celsius compared to the statistical baseline period.
Keywords

Subjects


Amirabadizadeh, M., Yaghoobzadeh, M., Hashemi, S. & khozaymehnezhad, H. (2019). Assessment linear and data-driven models in downscaling of precipitation and temperature in South khorasan Province. Journal of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, 2(1), 68-82. (in Persian)
Ansari Mahabadi, S., Massah Bavani, A. R. & Bagheri, A. )2018(. Improving adaptive capacity of social-ecological system of Tashk-Bakhtegan Lake Basin to climate change effects – A methodology based on Post-Modern Portfolio Theory. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology. 18(4), 365-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2018.11.002
Ansari, S., Dehban, H., Zareian, M. & Farokhnia, A. (2022). Investigation of temperature and precipitation changes in the Iran's basins in the next 20 years based on the output of CMIP6 model. Iranian Water Researches Journal, 16(1), 11-24. https://doi.org/10.22034/iwrj.2022.11204. (in Persian)
Chim, K., Tunnicliffe, J., Shamseldin, A. & Chan, K. (2021). Identifying future climate change and drought detection using CanESM2 in the upper Siem Reap River, Cambodia. Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans. 94- 101182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2020.101182
Chai, T. & Draxler, R. R. (2014). Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)?–Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature. Geoscientific model development, 7(3), 1247-1250. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014, 2014
Doulabian, S., Golian, S., Toosi, A. S. & Murphy, C. (2021). Evaluating the effects of climate change on precipitation and temperature for Iran using RCP scenarios. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 12(1), 166-184. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2020.114
Fallah-Ghalhari, G., Shakeri F. & DadashiRoudbari, A. (2019). Impacts of climate changes on the maximum and minimum temperature in Iran. Theoretical and Applied Climatology. 138(3-4), 1539- 1562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-019-02906-9
Golkar Hamzee Yazd, HR., Salehnia, N., Kolsoumi, S. & Hoogenboom, G., (2019). Prediction of climate variables by comparing the k-nearest neighbor method and MIROC5 outputs in an arid environment, Clim Res 77, 99-114. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01545
Gupta, H.V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K.K. & Martinez, G.F. (2009). Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 377: 1. 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003
IPBES. (2019).“Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.”In, edited by S. Díaz, J. Settele, E. S. Brondízio, H. T. Ngo, M. Guèze,J. Agard, A. Arneth, P. Balvanera, K. A. Brauman, S. H. M.Butchart, K. M. A. Chan, L. A. Garibaldi, K. Ichii, J. Liu, S. M.Subramanian,  G.  F.  Midgley,  P.  Miloslavich,  Z.  Molnar, D. Obura, A. Pfaff, S. Polasky, A. Purvis, J. Razzaque, B. Reyers,R. R. Chowdhury, Y. J. Shin, I. J. Visseren-Hamakers, K. J.Willis, and C. N. Zayas, 56. Bonn: IPBES Secretariat. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3553579
IPCC (2012) Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF, Qin D, Dokken DJ, Ebi KL, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Plattner G-K, Allen SK, Tignor M, Midgley PM (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Javaherian, MR., Ebeahimi, H. & Amininezhad, B. (2021). Prediction of changes in climatic parameters using CanESM2 model based on Rcp scenarios (case study): Lar dam basin. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12(1), 445-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.04.012
Jeong, D. I., Yu, B. & Cannon, A. J. (2023). Climate change impacts on linkages between atmospheric blocking and North American winter cold spells in CanESM2 and CanESM5. Climate Dynamics60(1-2), 477-491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06307-z
Kavwenje, S., Zhao, L., Chen, L. & Chaima, E. (2022). Projected temperature and precipitation changes using the LARS‐WG statistical downscaling model in the Shire River Basin, Malawi. International Journal of Climatology, 42(1), 400-415. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7250
Kim, YH., Min, SK., Zhang, X., Zwiers, F., Alexander, LV., Donat, MG. &  Tung YS (2016) Attribution of extreme temperature changes during 1951–2010. Clim Dyn 46(5–6), 1769–1782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2674-2
Krause, P., Boyle, D. P. & Base, F. (2005). Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment, Adv. Geosci. 5, 89-97. https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-5-89-2005
Mohammed, Z. M. & Hassan, W. H. (2022). Climate change and the projection of future temperature and precipitation in southern Iraq using a LARS-WG model. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01358-x
Naderi, S., Goodarzi, M. & Ghadami Dehno, M., (2018). Effects of Climate Change on Climate Parameters in Seymare Basin, Iranian Journal of Watershed Management Science and Engineering, 11(39), 69-76. (in Persian)
Nash JE. &  Sutclife, JV. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3), 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
Ostad-Ali-Askari, K., Ghorbanizadeh Kharazi, H., Shayannejad, M. & Zareian, M. J. (2020). Effect of climate change on precipitation patterns in an arid region using GCM models: case study of Isfahan-Borkhar Plain. Natural Hazards Review, 21(2), 04020006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000367
Rakhimova, M., Liu, T., Bissenbayeva, S., Mukanov, Y., Gafforov, K. S., Bekpergenova, Z. & Gulakhmadov, A. (2020). Assessment of the impacts of climate change and human activities on runoff using climate elasticity method and general circulation model (GCM) in the Buqtyrma river Basin, Kazakhstan. Sustainability. 12(12):4968. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124968
Razzaghian, H., Shahedi, K. & Habib nejad roshan, M. (2017). Evaluation of the climate change effect on Babol-rood watershed runoff using IHACRES model. Irrigation and Water Engineering7(2), 159-172. (in Persian)
Reboita, M. S., Kuki, C. A. C., Marrafon, V. H., de Souza, C. A., Ferreira, G. W. S., Teodoro, T. & Lima, J. W. M. (2022). South America climate change revealed through climate indices projected by GCMs and Eta-RCM ensembles. Climate Dynamics. 58(1), 459-485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05918-2
Sharafati A. Nabaei S. & Shahid S. (2020). Spatial assessment of meteorological drought features over different climate regions in Iran. International Journal of Climatology. 40(3), 1864-1884. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6307
Steffen, W., K. Richardson, J. Rockström, S. E. Cornell, I. Fetzer,E. M. Bennett, R. Biggs, S. R. Carpenter, W. De Vries. & C. A. De Wit. (2015).“Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet.”Science347: 1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
Van Oldenborgh GJ, Mitchell-Larson E, Vecchi GA, De Vries H, Vautard R. & Otto, F. (2019) Cold waves are getting milder in the northern midlatitudes. Environ Res Lett 14(11), 114004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab4867.
Venter, O., E. W. Sanderson, A. Magrach, J. R. Allan, J. Beher,K. R. Jones, H. P. Possingham, W. F. Laurance, P. Wood. & B. M. Fekete. (2016).“Sixteen Years of Change in the Global ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS35 of 37Terrestrial Human Footprint and Implications for Biodiversity Conservation.”Nature Communications7, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12558
Wilby, R. L. Dawson, C. W. and Barrow, E. M. (2002). “SDSM-a Decision Support tool for the assessment of regional Climate change impacts”, J. Environmental Modeling and Sothware, 17. 147-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00060-3
Yaghoobzadeh, M., Khashei, A., Ramazeni, Y. & Hosseini, S. A. (2022). The selection of the best from climate change model in the estimation of climatology variables for east region of the country by use fifth report data. Journal of Arid Regions Geographic Studies, 10(37), 68-78. https://sid.ir/paper/381961/en (in Persian).
Zareian, M. (2022). Effects of Climate Change on Temperature and Precipitation in Yazd Province Based on Combined Output of CMIP6 Models, Journal of Hydrology and Soil Science, 26(2), 91-105. http://jstnar.iut.ac.ir/article-1-4156-en.html (in Persian)
Zarrin, A., dadashi-rodbari, A. & Salehabadi, N. (2021). Projected temperature anomalies and trends in different climate zones in Iran based on CMIP6. Iranian Journal of Geophysics, 15(1), 35-54. doi: 10.30499/ijg.2020.249997.1292. (in Persian)

  • Receive Date 17 October 2023
  • Revise Date 10 December 2023
  • Accept Date 14 January 2024