Integrated Watershed Management

Integrated Watershed Management

Investigating factors affecting the participation and behavior of stakeholders in water and soil Conservation projects (Case of study: Benchele watershed, Ravansar city)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Adel Soltani
Reza Ghazavi
Siamak Dokhani
Department of Watershed Management Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Science University of Kashan, Kashan,Iran
10.22034/iwm.2023.2010899.1104
Abstract
Extended abstract
Introduction: Water and soil resources are the most important factors in the production of energy needed for humans. In order to protect water and soil resources, different management methods are applied according to the conditions of each region. The participation of all watershed residents and changing their behavior will be one of the basic tools of any sustainable management plan. Since norms affect the participation and behavior of local communities; the purpose of this research is to investigate the norms affecting the participation and behavior of watershed residents in the implementation of water and soil protection projects.
Materials and Methods: This research was done by descriptive-analytical method. For this purpose, Benchele watershed in Ravansar city was selected as the study area. A questionnaire was used to collect field data. The statistical population of this research was all heads of households of watershed residents in this area, numbering 569 people. Among them, using Cochran's formula and matching with Morgan's table, 229 people were directly questioned by simple random method and completed the questionnaires. Spearman's correlation tests and stepwise regression were used to analyze the data. The focus of the questions was focused on three independent variables (legal norms, normative beliefs and participatory norms) and two dependent variables (participation and behavior of watershed residents). In the data analysis section, descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage, average, etc.) and inferential statistics (Spearman's correlation test and step-by-step regression) were used. Before performing the regression to check the collinearity test, the degree of collinearity of the independent variables was examined. Also, standardized beta values were used to determine the relative importance of each independent variable in the participation and behavior of watershed residents.
Results and Discussion: The mean ranking results of each of the items of legal norms affecting the participation and behavior of watershed residents in water and soil protection projects show that the items of "people who damage water and soil resources should be fined" and "existing laws are useful to convince people in the field of protecting water and soil resources" have the greatest and least impact on legal norms with the participation and behavior of watershed residents, respectively. The results of the mean ranking of each of the items of normative beliefs affecting the participation and behavior of watershed residents in water and soil protection projects show that the highest ranking average is related to "society expects me to take care of water resources" and do not destroy the soil" and the lowest rating is related to "experts expect me not to destroy the soil". The mean ranking results of each items of the participation norm effective on the participation and cooperative behavior of watershed residents in water and soil protection projects show that from their point of view, the item "voluntarily participates in the construction of sediment dams" and the statement "I am willing to pay for the implementation of water and soil protection projects", respectively, have the greatest and least impact on the participation and behavior of watershed residents in water and soil protection projects. The results of Spearman's test showed that all three independent variables of legal norms, normative beliefs, and participatory norms have a positive and significant relationship with the participation and behavior of watershed residents. Also, the regression results and beta values showed that, respectively, the indicators of legal norms, normative beliefs, and participatory norms had the highest priority in the participation and behavior of local communities.
Conclusion: The results showed that about 66% of watershed residents have moderate to low participation and cooperative behavior. The mean ranking results of each of the watershed residents' participation and their behavior to participate in water and soil protection projects show that the watershed residents' care of the projects after its completion, participation in the mortar dam construction project Mortar-cement dam has the greatest effect on their participation and cooperative behavior. Also, the items of participation in the construction of gabion dam project and the desire and intention of watershed residents towards water and soil protection had the least effect on the participation and behavior of watershed residents towards water and soil protection. In general, paying attention to the norms, beliefs, behaviors and attitudes of local communities should be on the agenda of managers and planners to pave the way to protect water and soil resources.
Keywords
Regression
Watershed
Norm
Cochran formula
Questionnaire

Subjects

Ahmadi, F., Heydari, Q. & Shafiei, F. (2017). Economic and social factors affecting the willingness of users to participate in pasture improvement and revitalization projects (case study: Dehgolan pastures). Pasture and Desert Research of Iran, 25(1), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.22092/ijrdr.2018.116497. (in Persian).
Alló, M. & Loureiro, M. L. (2017). The role of social norms on conservation programmes in shellfish fisheries. Marine Policy. 84, 134- 141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.07.008.
Corral-Verdugo, V. & Frías-Armenta, M. (2006). Personal normative beliefs, antisocial behavior, and residential water conservation.Environment and Behavior. 38(3), 406-421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505282272.
Dehghanpour, H. & Zebaie, M. (2017).Investigating factors influencing farmers motivation in using water and soil protection technologies, agricultural economics and development. 28 (110), 146-121. https://doi.org/10.30490/AEAD.2020.280471.1051. (in Persian).
Ghazavi, R. (2020). Watershed Management- strategic Approach. Kashan Univesity. pp. 220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517- 020-06121-z. (in Persian).
Hurlimann, A., Dolnicar, S. & Meyer, P. (2001). Understanding behavior to inform water supply management in developed nations–A review of literature, conceptual model and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(1), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.07.014.
Jalili, J. & Jalili, Kh. (2009). A detailed study plan for the control of erosion and sedimentation in the Bencheleh study area. Tehran, Iran: Academic Jahad Centers. 803609/fa (in Persian).
Kalantari, Kh. (2010). Data processing and analysis in economic and social research, Farhang Saba. 388 pages (in Persian).
Katuwal, H. (2012) Demand for water quality: empirical evidence from a knowledge, attitude, behavior, and choice experiment survey about the Bagmati River in Kathmandu, Nepal. PhD Dissertation at University of New Mexico.
Kilic, D. S. & Dervisoglu, S. (2013). Examination of water saving behavior within framework of Theory of Planned Behavior. International Journal of Secondary Education, 1(3), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20130103.11
Klöckner, C. A. (2013). A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behavior: A metaanalysis. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1028-1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.014.
Mirzaei, H. & Ahmadi, F. (2021). Analysis of the norms affecting the cooperative behavior of pastoralists in the direction of protection of pastures (study case: Karimabad watershed, Dehgolan city). Research on protection and protection of forests and pastures of Iran, 19(1), 110-124. https://doi.org/10.22092/IJFRPR.2021.352007.1448. (in Persian).
Mousavi Nokandeh, S.M., Meiri, M.H. & Salman Hahini, A.R. (2014). Beneficiaries and their identification criteria in natural resources management, (Case study: Golestan province forests), Wood and Forest Science and Technology Research Journal, 21(4), 23-40. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.23222077.1393.21.4.2.3. (in Persian).
Noguera-Méndez P, Molera L. & Semitiel-García M (2016). The role of social learning in fostering farmers’ pro-environmental values and intentions. Journal of Rural Studies 46, 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.06.003
Ohta, R., Ryu, Y. & Otani, J. (2020). Rural physicians perceptions about the challenges of participating in interprofessional collaboration: Insights from a focus group interview. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, 100345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2020.100345.
Prager, K., Nienaber, B., Neumann, B. & Phillips, A. (2015) How should rural policy be evaluated if it aims to foster community involvement in environmental management. Journal of Rural Studies 37, 120-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.12.006
Ranjbar, B., Naimi, A. & Nahavandian, F. (2018). Analysis of the norms influencing the cooperative behavior of farmers in the direction of water protection in the watershed of Zarivar lagoon, Marivan city, Iranian Journal of Extension Sciences and Agricultural Education. 15 (2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.22034/IAEEJ.2020.194549.1443. (in Persian).
Salehi, S., Chizari, M., Sediqi, H. & Bijani, M. (2016). The effect of environmental beliefs on the sustainable behavior of Fars province farmers in the exploitation of underground water resources, Journal of Extension Sciences and Agricultural Education. 13 (1), 193-175. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.20081758.1396.13.1.12.0. (in Persian).
Schultz, P. W. (2002). Knowledge, information, and household recycling: Examining the knowledge-deficit model of behavior change. In New Tools for Environmental Protection: Education, Information, and Voluntary measures (pp. 67-82), Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10401.
Soopramanien, D., Daryanto, A. & Song, Z. (2023). Urban residents environmental citizenship behaviour: The roles of place attachment, social norms and perceived environmental responsibility. Cities, 132, 104-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104097.
Toke R, F., Hansen, L, G. & Wengström, E. (2023). Norm compliance in an uncertain world.  Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 107, 102083.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2023.102083.
Valizadeh, N., Bijani, M. & Abbasi, A. (2014). Environmental analysis of cooperative behavior of farmers in the protection of surface water resources in the southern catchment area of Lake Urmia, Journal of Science and Promotion of Agricultural Education. 11 (2), 183-201. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.20081758.1394.11.2.12.8. (in Persian).
Vucetich, J, A. & Nelson M. P. (2010) Sustainability: virtuous or vulgar. BioScience, 60 (7), 539-544. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.7.9.
Zahedi Mazandarani, M. J., Shiani, M. & Alipour, P. (2014). The influence of participatory norms on social welfare, Scientific-Research Quarterly of Social Welfare, 14 (52), 33-63. (in Persian).

  • Receive Date 11 September 2023
  • Revise Date 04 November 2023
  • Accept Date 23 December 2023