Integrated Watershed Management

Integrated Watershed Management

Presentation of management responses regarding the strategy of improving the water resources status of Zayandeh Roud Watershed

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Faculty of Natural Resources and Desert Studies, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
Abstract
Extended Abstract
Introduction
In arid and semi-arid regions, water is considered as the most important restrictive factor in drinking, industry and agriculture. In this regard, Zayandehroud River is a prominent example of human and environmental concerns in this climate. Due to the large area of the Zayandeh Roud Watershed and the difficulty of developing and implementing a comprehensive participatory management model for the entire watershed, one of the upstream sub-watersheds of the Zayandeh roud Dam was selected for this study based on the Eskandri sub-watershed. This sub-watershed is important because its outlet leads to Zayandeh roud Dam. In addition, this sub-watershed is one of the most important sources of agricultural water supply, drinkable water, and industry in the region and province of Isfahan. Therefore, this study aims to present management responses regarding the strategy of improving the water resources status of the Eskandari sub-watershed with a logical framework approach.
Materials and methods:
First, the water resources status of the Eskandari sub-watershed was investigated using the Falkenmark index (FI). This index classifies the regions according to the annual renewable per capita volume (RW) for the provision of water resources. Based on the annual renewable per capita volume per person (m3/person), the FI is asfollows: no stress (FI<1700), stress (1000-1700), water low water (500-1000) and absolute deficiency (FI>500). In the following, in order to achieve the goals of integrated watershed management, the logical framework approach was used. Therefore, by identifying the stakeholders and organization of workshops, a problem tree and objectives for the desired strategy was drawn and a logical framework matrix was prepared based on the tree of objectives. In this research, 30 members from stakeholders (random sampling method) were selected as the sample for the resident questionnaire. In other words, the main, sub-goals, achievements, and activities in order to solve the stated problem were extracted from the objectives tree and classified in the framework of the logical framework matrix. Also, the opinion of 28 experts was also considered as a large group decision-making to prioritize items. The expert group consisted of experts from the Departments of Natural Resources and Watershed Management, Environment, Regional Water, and also scientific members of universities of Yazd and Esfahan, and some members of the village council. In the following, for the assessment, prioritization, and feasibility of doing any management response, first, the criteria and indicators for measuring different responses related to the status of the water resources of the Eskandari sub-watershed were determined. Then, the prioritization and selection of responses were done using the questionnaire method and the Friedman's test.
Results and Discussion:
The results of the research showed that the amount of renewable water per person is 637.60 m3. According to the classification provided by Falkenmark, this shows that the Eskandari sub-watershed is in the low water category. In the following, the results of the logical framework showed that the response of the development of optimal allocation plans for water consumption and regulation of water rights has been assigned the highest score according to the indicators and criteria considered. The responses to the strengthening of supervisory and executive mechanisms and modification of laws and regulations for issuance of exploitation licenses and also, preparation and compilation of integrated water resources management plan were the next priorities in terms of status improvement, respectively. In addition, the results of the significance test indicate a significant effect of managerial responses at five percent 0.05 (P=0.00).
Conclusion:
This study aimed to provide optimal management responses regarding the strategy of improving the status of water resources based on the expectations and perceptions of the stakeholders. Therefore, due to the ineffectiveness of the solutions in recent years, the implementation of the integrated management program of the Eskandari sub-watershed through the logical framework approach and the participation of all stakeholders is suggested in order for the principled and sustainable exploitation of water resources. Also, reinforcement of regulatory laws is recommended in order to observe water rights and access more equity in exploitation. In addition, in order to reduce water scarcity and improve the condition of watershed, the policies of the water sector should be enforced in a larger framework and with internal and external cooperation.
Keywords

Subjects


Alvandi, E., Sadoddin, A. & Sheikh, V.B. (2019). Developing a Web-Based Integrated Bayesian Decision Support System for Environmental Problems in a Semi-Arid Watershed. Developing a Web-Based Integrated Bayesian Decision Support System for Environmental Problems in a Semi-Arid Watershed. Doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.12.021 (In Persian)
Athari, Z., Pezeshki rad, G.R., Abbasi, A. & Alibeigi, A.H. (2015). Explaining the appropriate model of comprehensive management of watersheds in the country. J Space Geography, 6 (20), 226-209, from https://gps.gu.ac.ir/article_34094.html (In Persian)
Badham, J., Elsawah, S., Guillaume, J., Hamilton, S., Hunt, R., Jakeman, A.J. & Pierce, S. (2019). Effective modeling for Integrated Water Resource Management: A guide to contextual practices by phases and steps and future opportunities. Environmental Modelling and Software, 116, 40-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.02.013.
Bithas, K. (2008). The sustainable residential water use: Sustainability, efficiency and social equity. The European experience. Ecological Economics, 68, (1-2): 221-229. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.021.
Compilation of integrated management plan in Habaleroud watershed, 2018. (In Persian)
Effectiveness studies of watershed operation in Zayandehroud dam basin. Groundwater report; 2021. (In Persian)
Fallah, S., Ghobadinia, M., Shokrgozar Darabi, M. & Ghorbani Dashtaki, SH. (2012). Study of the Sustainability of Darab Groundwater in Fars Province, Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 26 (2): 162-172. DOI: 10.22092/ jwra. 2012.118963 (In Persian)
Falkenmark, M. (1989). The massive water scarcity now threatening Africa: why isn't it being addressed? Ambio, 112-118, from https: //www.jstor.org/stable/4313541.
Fishman, R., Devineni, N. & Raman, S. (2015). Can improved agricultural water use efficiency save India’s groundwater. Environmental Research Letters, 10 (8), 084022. DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/084022.
Jackson, B. (2000). Designing projects and project evaluations using the logical framework approach. Guideline of logical framework approach, from http://www.iucn.org/themes/ssp/index.html.
Jens, B.A. (2000). Logical Framework Approach and PRA- mutually exclusive or complementary tools for project planning? Development in Practice, 10, 5, 687-690, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/4029542.
Jensen, A. (2010). The logical framework approach. How to guide. 8 pp, from https://www. Susana. Org/en/knowledge- hub/resources-and-publications/ library/ details/ 4722.
Karandish, F., Hoekstra, A.Y. & Hogeboom, R.J. (2018). Groundwater saving and quality improvement by reducing water footprints of crops to benchmarks levels. Advances in Water Resources, 121, 480-491. DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.09.011.
Karandish, F. (2019). Applying grey water footprint assessment to achieve environmental sustainability within a nation under intensive agriculture: a high-resolution assessment for common agrochemicals and crops. Environmental Earth Sciences. DOI: 10.1007/s12665-019-8199-y.
Karandish, F. (2021). Socioeconomic benefits of conserving Iran’s water resources through modifying agricultural practices and water management strategies. Ambio. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-021-01534-w.
Karimi, Z. & Talebi A. (2022a). Integrated land management or Integrated watershed management. Extension and Development of Watershed Management, 10, 37, 57-66. DOI: 20.1001.1.20089597. 1401.10.37.9.1 (In Persian)
Karimi, Z. & Talebi, A. (2022b). Presenting the integrated management model based on ecosystem service indicators in Zayandeh-roud watershed. Extension and Development of Watershed Management, 10, 37, 13-20. DOI: 20.1001.1.20089597.1401.10.38.9.2. (In Persian)
Karimi, Z. & Talebi, A. (2023). The state of water resources in the future of Zayandeh Roud-Eskandari watershed. The 6th National Conference on Soil Protection and Watershed Management, focusing on the balancing and sustainability of water resources in watersheds, August 24-25. (In Persian)
Karimi, Z. (2023). A review of project planning using the Logical Framework Approach (LFA) and Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA). Journal of Nature and Spatial Sciences, 3, 2, 58-71. DOI: 10.30495 /jonass. 2023. 1990336.1075.
Kragt, M.E. (2009). A beginner’s guide to Bayesian network modeling for integrated catchment 773 management (Technical Report No. 9, Landscape Logic). Hobart, 22p.
Lei, W., Changbin, L., Xuhong, X., Zhibin, H., Wanrui, W., Yuan, Z., Jianmei, W. & Jianan, L. (2020). The impact of increasing land productivity on groundwater dynamics: a case study of an oasis located at the edge of the Gobi Desert. Carbon Balance and Management, 15(7). DOI: 10.1186/s13021-020-00142-7.
Loucks, D.P. (2020). From analyses to implementation and innovation. Water (Switzerland), 12 (4): 1–11. DOI: 10.3390/w12040974.
Mutekanga, F. (2012). Participatory policy development for integrated watershed management in Uganda’s highlands. PhD Thesis University of Wageningen.
Murray-Rust, H., Salemi, H. & Droogers, P. (2002). Water resources development and water utilization in the zayandeh rud basin, Iran. IAERI-IWMI Research Reports 14.
NORAD. (1995). Guide to Planning and Evaluation NGO Projects, Number 2: Core Elements in Planning Development Assistance, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/4029542.
Raja, O., Parsinejad, M., Sohrabi, T. & Ahmadauli, Kh. (2018). Status Investigation of the Marvdasht- Kharameh Water Resources Using Sustainability Analysis Indicators. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 50, 4, 897-909. from, https://civilica.com/doc/1664579 (In Persian)
Roduner, D. & Schlappi, W. (2008). Logical framework approach and outcome mapping a constructive attempt of synthesis. 18 pp, from http://www.nadel.ethz.ch.
Safavi, H.R., Darzi, F. & Mariño, M.A. (2010). Simulation-optimization modeling of conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater. Water resources management, 24, 10, 1965-1988. DOI: 10.24200/ j30.2018. 2188. 2130 (In Persian)
Salari, S., Karandish, F., Haghighatjou, P. & Aldaya, M. (2022). Efficient and sustainable use of water resources in Khuzestan through water footprint benchmarking. Journal of Water and Soil Resources Conservation, 11, 4, 35-49. DOI: 10.30495/ wsrcj. 2022. 20329 (In Persian)
Salehpour Jam, A., Mosaffaie, J. & Tabatabaei, M.R. (2021). Management Responses for Chehel-Chay Watershed Health Improvement Using the DPSIR Framework. Agricultural Science & Technology, 23. (4): 797-811. DOI: 20.1001.1.16807073.2021.23.4.3.2.
Shahedi, M. & Talebihossian abad, F. (2013). An Indicator of Application to Assess Water Balance and Development Sustainability. Water and Sustainable Development, 1 (1): 73-79. DOI: 10.22067/ jwsd. v1i1. 34603 (In Persian)
Sheikh, V.B., Zaregarizi, A., Asadinalivan, A, Alvandi, A. & Khosravi, G.R. (2018). Strategic document of comprehensive management of Chelchai watershed (with IWM approach). From https://civilica.com/doc/1012164/ (In Persian)
Sheikh, V.B., Alvandi, E., Asadi Nalivan, O., Khosravi, G.h. & Zare Garizi, A. (2018). Introducing a Logical Framework for Strategic Planning of Watershed Management (case study: Chehelchai Watershed). 14th National conference on watershed management sciences and engineering of Iran watershed management and integrated management of water and soil resources. July 26-27, Urmia University, from https://www. tpbin.com/article/75363 (In Persian)
Statistical yearbook of the province of Isfahan; 2021. (In Persian)
Teerakul, B., Rongsayamanont, C.h., Darnsawasdi, R. & Kosolsaksakul, P. (2023). A Combined DPSIR Framework and Logical Framework Approach for Sustainable Water Resources Management in the Lagoon Floodplain. Journal of Environment and Natural Resources, 21 (3): 211-221. DOI: 10.32526/ ennrj/ 21/ 202200170
Vanoppen, J. (1994). The use of OOIP in Coopibo-supported programmes in Zimbabwe’, Proceedings of INTRAC and South Research Workshop on LFA and OOIP, Keuven, Belgium, May 16–18, Part 2.
Zibai, M.H., Zibai, M. & Ardokhani, k. (2013). Evaluation of combined use scenarios of surface and underground water resources in Firouzabad Plain Fars. Agricultural Economics Research, 5(1), 157-181. DOR: 20.1001.1.20086407.1392.5.17.9.4 (In Persian)

  • Receive Date 17 October 2023
  • Revise Date 11 November 2023
  • Accept Date 09 December 2023