Integrated Watershed Management

Integrated Watershed Management

Evaluation of the efficiency of REMO regional climate model and CanESM2 general circulation model in predicting climatic parameters (Case study: Isfahan province)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Dry and Mountainous Rehabilitation, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Rehabilitation Engineering, Arid and Mountainous Areas, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 Faculty of Geographical Sciences and Planning, Isfahan university, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
Extended Abstract
Introduction: The increase in greenhouse gases in recent decades and the resulting increase in temperature have upset the balance of the Earth's climate system and caused widespread climate change in most parts of the world. According to the definition of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2013), climate change is a change in the state of a climate in which its mean or changeable characteristics change for decades or longer. Therefore, forecasting climate variables in the future is necessary to consider measures to reduce the effects of climate change. Climate models are good tools for assessing the climate in the future. These models simulate climatic parameters in the future by different scenarios of radiation induction. Selecting an appropriate climate model is essential for predicting and simulating climate data in the future, as well as evaluating changes in climate parameters in the future. An overview of studies conducted on the application of climate change models in the country indicates that in most studies, the application of atmospheric circulation models has been studied and regional models have been evaluated less. Therefore, in this study, two models of general circulation of atmosphere and region in Isfahan province are compared.
Materials and methods: Isfahan province, with an area of 107018 square kilometers, is located between 30 degrees and 43 minutes to 34 degrees and 37 minutes north latitude of the equator and 49 degrees and 38 minutes to 55 degrees and 32 minutes east longitude of the Greenwich meridian. The climate of Isfahan province is generally temperate and dry. In this research, daily observational data including rainfall, average temperature and average wind speed from the Meteorological Organization, data predicted by REMO model in the base period 1991-2005 and the future period 2020-2100 for the parameters of rainfall, average temperature and wind speed from the base CORDEX data and three types of inputs were used to model climate variables by CanESM2 model. These inputs include daily precipitation data, mean temperature and mean wind speed of the synoptic station, open atmosphere analysis data (NCEP) and CanESM2 model data. To evaluate the efficiency of the models in the study area, the observational data and the data predicted by the models in the common statistical period by the statistical criteria of Percentage coefficient (PBIAS), Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient (NSE), standard ratio root (RSR), explanation coefficient (R2) and square error (RMSE) were assessed. Also, in order to better evaluate the performance of the models, the data simulated by the models were compared with the observational data by months.
Results and Discussion: The results of this study for the REMO regional climate model showed that this model is not suitable for simulating the rainfall parameter in Isfahan, Airport, Kashan and Golpayegan stations, nor is it suitable for simulating the average temperature parameter in Isfahan, Golpayegan, Nain and Kashan stations. In these stations, on average, the values simulated by the model for the precipitation parameter are more than the observational values and for the average temperature parameter are less than the observational values. In other studied stations, the values simulated by the model for rainfall parameters and average temperature have an acceptable agreement with the observational data. Also, the correlation of the simulated values of the model with the observational data for the wind parameter indicates that this model is not suitable for predicting wind data in the study area and the values simulated by the model are on average higher than the observational data in the period. The results of the CanESM2 atmospheric circulation model showed that the SDSM model has a high efficiency for modeling and exponential microscale in the study area. The results also showed that this model has a high efficiency for simulating the parameters of average temperature and wind speed relative to rainfall in the study area, which can be due to the presence of zero values in the data series. The results of rainfall parameter statistical criteria showed that the CanESM2 model in Daran, Isfahan, Khor and Biabank, Nain and Natanz stations is suitable for simulating rainfall in the future. Also, the results of the statistical criteria and simulated data of the model in the joint period for temperature and wind parameters showed high agreement with the observational data.
Conclusion: Climate models are appropriate tools for assessing the climate in the future. In this study, the efficiency of REMO regional climate models and the general CanESM2 atmospheric model were investigated. The results showed that the REMO climate model does not have the appropriate efficiency to simulate rainfall, average and wind speed in the study area, but CanESM climate model has high efficiency to simulate average and wind speed in the region. It can therefore be used as a suitable model for forecasting future climate in the study area.
Keywords

Abassi, F., Malbusi, S., Babaeian, I., Asmari, M. & Borhani R. (2010). Climate Change Prediction of South Khorasan Province During 2010-2039 by Using Statistical Downscaling of ECHO-G Data. Water &Soil, 24(2), 218–33. Dio: 10.22067/JSW.V0I0.3218. (In Persian)
Aghakhani Afshar, A.H., Hassanzadeh, Y., Besalatpour, A.A. & Pourreza-Bilondi, M. (2016). Annual assessment of Kashafrood watershed basin climate components in future periods by using fifth report of intergovernmental panel on climate change. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 23, 217-233. Dio: 10.22069/JWFST.2017.11186.2553. (In Persian)
Alizadeh, A., Sayari, N., Hesami Kermani, M. R., Bannayan Aval, M. & Farid Hossaini A. (2010). Assessment of Climate Change Potential Impacts on Agricultural Water Use and Water Resources of Kashaf rood basin. Water& Soil, 24(4), 815–35. (In Persian)
Almazroui, M., Nazrul Islam, M., Saeed, F. Alkhalaf, A. & Dambul, R. (2017). Assessing the robustness and uncertainties of projected changes in temperature and precipitation in AR5 Global Climate Models over the Arabian Peninsula. Atmospheric Research, 194(2017), 202- 213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.05.005
Andersen, H. E., Kronvang, B., Larsen, S. E., Hoffmann, C. C., Jensen, T. S. & Rasmussen, E. K. (2006). Climate-change impacts on hydrology and nutrients in a Danish lowland river basin. Science of the Total Environment, 365(1), 223-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.02. 036.
Ansari, M., Noori, G. & Fotohi, S. (2016). Investigation of Temperature Precipitation and Flow Trend Using Nonparametric Mankendall (Case Study: Kaju River in Sistan and Baluchestan). Journal of Watershed Management Research, 7(14), 153-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/jwmr.7. 14.158. (In Persian)
Cheema, S.B., Rasul, G., Ali, G. & Kazmi, D. H. (2011). A comparison of minimum temperature trends with model projections. Pakistan Journal of Meteorology, 8(15), 39-52.
Chen, H., Xu, C. Y. & Guo, S. (2012). Comparison and evaluation of multiple GCMs, statistical downscaling and hydrological models in the study of climate change impacts on runoff. Journal of hydrology, 434, 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.040.
Dibaba, W. T., Miegel, K. & Demissie, T. A. (2019). Evaluation of the CORDEX regional climate models performance in simulating climate conditions of two catchments in Upper Blue Nile Basin. Dynam Atmos Oceans, 87, 101104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2019.101104. 
Dibike, Y. B. & Coulibaly, P. (2005). Hydrologic impact of climate change in the Saguenay watershed: Comparison of downscaling methods and hydrologic models. Hydrology, 307 (1-4), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.10.012.
Ebrahimi Khusfi Z. & Mirakbari, M. (2020). Performance evaluation of the CanESM2 global circulation model and the REMO regional model to predict changes of climate Parameters in Jazmourian watershed. Watershed Management Research, 4(129), 61-76. DIO:10.22092/wme .2020.341365.1300. (In Persian)  
Gebremeskel, S., Liu, Y. B., de Smedt, F., Hoffmann, L. & Pfister, L. (2005). Analysing the effect of climate changes on streamflow using statistically downscaled GCM scenarios. International Journal River Basin Management, 2(4), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2004.9635237 
Ghonchepur, D., Saadaldin, A., Bahremand, A. R., Gikman, A. & Salmanmahiny, A. R. (2019). Application of quantitative screening method in statistical exponential micro-scale model (SDSM) to create climate change scenarios (Case study: Gorgan River basin). Echo Hydrology, 6(2). 397-314. (In Persian)
Goudarzi, M., Salahi, B. & Hosseini, S. A. (2015). Performance Assessment of LARS-WG and SDSM Downscaling Models In Simulation of Climate Changes in Urmia Lake Basin. IranWatershed Management Science & Engineering, 9(31). http://jwmsei.ir/article-1-457-en.html. (In Persian)
Gulacha, M. M. & Mulungu, D. M. (2017). Generation of climate change scenarios for precipitation and temperature at local scales using SDSM in Wami-Ruvu River Basin Tanzania. Physics and Chemistry of Earth, Parts A/B/C, 62-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2016.10.003.
Hoshyar, S., Sobhani, M. & Hosseini, S. A. (2018). Perspective of Maximum Uromieh Temperature Changes Using the Output of CanESM2 Model. Journal of Geography and Planning, 22(63), 305-325. Doi: 4-15. (In Persian)
Huang, J., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Xu, C., Wang, B. & Yao, J. (2011). Estimation of future precipitation change in the Yangtze River basin by using statistical downscaling method. Stochastic Environmental Research Risk Assessment, 25(6), 781–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-010-0441-9
IPCC, 2013. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Jahangir, M. H., Noruzi, A. & Yarahmadi, Y. (2018). Investigating the trend of changes in climatic parameters of Boroujerd city in the next 20 years using the model HADCM3. Echo Hydrology, 5(4), 1345-1353.Dio: https://dx.doi.org/10.22059/ije.2018.269238.979. (In Persian)
Kabiri, R., Ramani Bai, V. & Chan, A. (2015). Assessment of hydrologic impacts of climate change on the runoff trend in Klang Watershed Malaysia. Environmental Earth Science Journal, 73, 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3392-5.
Mahmood, R. & Babel, S. M. (2012). Evaluation of SDSM developed by annual and monthly sub-models for downscaling temperature and precipitation in the Jhelum basin, Pakistan and India. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 113(1), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-012-0765-0
Miao, C.Y., Duan, Q.Y., Sun, Q.H. & Li, J.D. (2013). Evaluation and application of Bayesian multi-model estimation in temperature simulations. Progress in Physical Geography, 37(6), 727-744. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0309133313494961.
Mirakbari, M., Mesbahzadeh, T., Mohseni Saravi, M., Khosravi, H. & Mortezaie Farizhendi, G. (2018). Performance of series model CMIP5 in simulation and projection of climatic variables of rainfall, temperature and wind speed (case study: Yazd). Physical Geography Research Quarterly, 50(3), 593-609. Doi:10.22059/jphgr.2018.248177.1007156.‌ (In Persian)
Moss, R.H., Edmonds, J.A., Hibbard, K.A., Manning, M.R., Rose, S.K., Van Vuuren, D.P., Carter, T.R., Emori, S., Kainuma, M., Kram, T., Meehl, G.A., Mitchell,  J.F., Nalicenovic, N., Riahi, K., Smith, S.J., Stouffer, R.J., Thomson, A.M., Weyant, J.P. & Wilbanks, T.J. (2010). The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Journa of Nature, 463(7282), 747-756. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08823.
Secci, D., Tanda, M. G., D'Oria, M., Todaro, V. & Fagandini, C. (2021). Impacts of climate change on groundwater droughts by means of standardized indices and regional climate models. Journal of Hydrology, 603, 127154.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127154.
Wetterhall, F., Bárdossy, A., Chen, D., Halldin, S. & Xu, C. Y. (2006). Daily precipitation‐downscaling techniques in three Chinese regions. Water resources research, 42(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004573.
Wilby, R. L., Whitehead, P. G., Wade, A. J., Butterfield, D., Davis, R. J. & Watts, G. (2006). Integrated modelling of climate change impacts on water resources and quality in a lowland catchment: River Kennet, UK. Journal of hydrology, 330(1-2), 204-220‌. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jhydrol.2006.04.033.
Xu, C.H. & Xu, Y. (2012). The Projection of Temperature and Precipitation over China under RCP Scenarios using a CMIP5 Multi-Model Ensemble. Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters, 5(6), 527-533. https://doi.org/10.1080/16742834.2012.11447042
Yosefi, H., Amini, L., Ghasemi, L. & Amrai, N. (2018). Evaluation of the efficiency of statistical downscaling model (SDSM) in simulation and forecast of climatic parameters (Case study: Karaj synoptic station). Iranian journal of Ecohydrology, 5(3),957-968‌. https://dx.doi.org/10.22059/ije. 2018.254290.847. (In Persian)
Zakeri Anaraki, S., Zehtabian, G., Khosravi, H., Azarnivand, H. & Malekian, A. (2021). Simulation and prediction of climatic components of maximum and minimum temperature using CanESM2 model output in future periods, Case study؛ Meyme plain, Isfahan province. Journal of Range and Watershed Managment, 74(2), 359-372.‌ https://dx.doi.org/10.22059/jrwm.2019.2565 14.1327. (In Persian)
Zhuo, C., Junhong, G., Wei, L., Fei, Z., Chan, X. & Zhangrong, P. (2022). Changes in wind energy potential over China using a regional climate model ensemble. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 159, 112219‌. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112219

  • Receive Date 02 June 2022
  • Revise Date 10 July 2022
  • Accept Date 11 July 2022