Integrated Watershed Management

Integrated Watershed Management

Evaluation of the efficiency of the SWAT+ model in mountainous watersheds in arid and semi-arid regions (Case study: Meymeh watershed, Ilam)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Technology and Engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
2 Department of range and watershed management, Ilam university, Ilam, Iran
3 Department of Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran
Abstract
Extended Abstract
Introduction:   A watershed system regulates both the quantity and quality of water within the hydrological cycle. Challenges have arisen in managing this cycle, largely due to insufficient understanding of its complexity and inadequate planning regarding the interconnections between water resource management and community development. Effective watershed management requires comprehensive and accurate information on various technical and managerial approaches. Simulating hydrological processes within a watershed is considered a promising approach for achieving optimal management. This study aims to develop and evaluate a new rainfall-runoff model for the Meymeh Watershed as a mountainous watershed located in a semi-arid region of Ilam Province, Iran.
 Materials and methods:  
This study was conducted using the new SWAT+ model. SWAT+ is a powerful tool for achieving watershed management objectives, offering a flexible spatial representation of basin processes and responses. It integrates a large number of parameters, utilizes the free QGIS software, and features a robust graphical interface.The data required for this research include meteorological records from the watershed and its surrounding areas, historical flow data of the Meymeh River, a Digital Elevation Model (DEM), and geological and soil maps. Meteorological data were collected from two synoptic stations near the watershed and 20 rain gauges located within and around the watershed, sourced from governmental organizations. Historical and observed daily flow data from a hydrometric station at the watershed outlet were also obtained from existing databases.Daily meteorological and hydrological data from 2010 to 2020 were used to simulate streamflow in the study area. Considering that using multiple statistical indicators can lead to mixed interpretations of model performance, in this study were employed the coefficient of determination (R²), Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Mean Bias Error (MBE) to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the model.
 Results and Discussion: Based on the results, NS, R2 coefficients, MAE and MBE were obtained -0.38 , 0.39, 11.1 and 8.4 respectively, using non-optimized coefficients using in the initial run of the model. According to the value of the objective functions in the first run, it was found that the SWAT+ model has insufficient accuracy for the watershed runoff simulation, so the calibration operation is necessary to improve its accuracy. For calibration, ten coefficients and parameters that are effective in producing watershed runoff were determined. These parameters were entered into the model along with the allowed range of their changes (Theoretically) and were real and optimized during 2000 iterations. Following this process, the R2, Nash-Sutcliffe coefficients, MAE and MBE for the calibration period (2010-2018) were obtained 0.72, 0.70, 2.97 and 0.58 respectively, and for the validation period (2019-2020), 0.78, 0.77, 7.6 and 0.38 respectively. In order to evaluate the ability of the model in simulating base and peak flows and also checking their temporal consistency with the observed data, scatter plots and time series of observed and simulated daily flow values were drawn for the calibration and validation periods. A detailed review of the drawn graphs showed that this model has correctly identified the time of the peak flows. Also, the daily fluctuations of the river flow are correctly modeled. From a graphical point of view, the comparison of the time series plots during the validation period shows that the SWAT+ model estimated the peak and base flows close to the actual values.
 Conclusion: The results of this study showed that SWAT+ has a good ability to simulate of daily runoff in The Meymeh river watershed. It can also  be applied to simulate runoff under different management scenarios and in other watersheds with similar environmental and hydrological conditions.
Keywords
Subjects

Akoko, G., Le, T. H., Gomi, T., & Kato, T. (2021). A review of SWAT model application in Africa. Water, 13(9), 1313. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091313
Alderman, K., Turner, L. R., & Tong, S. (2013). Assessment of the health impacts of the 2011 summer floods in Brisbane. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 7(4), 380–386. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2013.42
Apollonio, C., Bruno, M. F., Iemmolo, G., Molfetta, M. G., & Pellicani, R. (2020). Flood risk evaluation in ungauged coastal areas: The case study of ippocampo (Southern Italy). Water, 12(5), 1466. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051466
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., & Williams, J. R. (1998). Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: Model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 34, 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x
Bieger, K., Arnold, J. G., Rathjens, H., White, M. J., & Bosch, D. D., Allen, P. M., Volk, M., & Srinivasan, R. (2017). Introduction to SWAT+, a completely restructured version of the soil and water assessment tool. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 53(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12482
Gayathri, K. D., Ganasri, B.P., & Dwarakish. G.S. (2015). A review on hydrological models. Aquatic Procedia, 4, 1001–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.126
Ha, L., Bastiaanssen, W., van Griensven, A., van Dijk, A., & Senay, G. (2017). SWAT-CUP for calibration of spatially distributed hydrological processes and ecosystem services in a Vietnamese river basin using remote sensing. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2017-251
Hadi Qoraqi, R., & Delavar, M. (2024). Investigating changes in water balance components using the SWAT+ model and determining the role of factors affecting them. Journal of Water and Irrigation Management, 13(4), 1071–1092. https://doi.org/10.22059/jwim.2023.358050.1066
Hamidi Machekposhti, K., Sedghi, H., Telvari, A., & Babazadeh, H. (2017). Flood analysis in Karkheh River Basin using stochastic model. Civil Engineering Journal, 3(9), 794-808. http://dx.doi.org/10.21859/cej-030915
Ilam Regional Water Company. (2021). Study and design of monitoring network for the quality of water resources in the Dehlran watershed. (In Persian)
Jabbar, F. K., & Grote, K. (2020). Evaluation of the predictive reliability of a new watershed health assessment method using the SWAT model. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192(1), 224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-8182-9
Kakarndee, I., & Kositsakulchai, E. (2020). Comparison between SWAT and SWAT+ for simulating streamflow in a paddyfield-dominated basin, northeast Thailand. The 13th Thai Society of Agricultural Engineering International Conference (TSAE 2020).      https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202018706002
Maite Meaurio, Zabaleta, A., Uriarte, J. A., Srinivasan, R., & Antigüedad, I. (2015). Evaluation of SWAT model performance to simulate streamflow spatial origin: The case of a small forested watershed. Journal of Hydrology, 525, 326–334. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.050
Marin, M., Clinciu, I., Tudose, N., Ungurean, C., Adorjani, A., Mihalache, A., Davidescu, A., Davidescu, S. O., Dinca, L., & Cacovean, H. (2020). Assessing the vulnerability of water resources in the context of climate changes in a small forested watershed using SWAT: A review. Environmental Research, 184, 109330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109330
Mohammadinia, L., Ahmadi Marzaleh, M., & Peyravi, M. R. (2021). Report of field assessment in the flooded areas of Iran, 2019. Health in Emergencies and Disasters Quarterly, 6(2), 73–78. http://doi.org/10.32598/hdq.6.2.190.1
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., & Veith, T. L. (2007). Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE, 50(3), 885–900. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153
Paranjothy, S., Gallacher, J., Amlôt, R., Rubin, G. J., Page, L., Baxter, T., & Palmer, S. R. (2011). Psychosocial impact of the summer 2007 floods in England. BMC Public Health, 11, 145.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-145
Petroselli, A., & Grimaldi, S. (2018). Design hydrograph estimation in small and fully ungauged basins: A preliminary assessment of the EBA4SUB framework. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 11, S197–S210. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12193
Rahmati, O., Zeinivand, H., & Besharat, M. (2016). Flood hazard zoning in Yasooj region, Iran, using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 7(3), 1000–1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2015.1045043
Rufino, P. R., Gücker, B., Faramarzi, M., Boëchat, I. G., Cardozo, F. d. S., Santos, P. R., Zanin, G. D., Mataveli, G., & Pereira, G. (2023). Evaluation of the SWAT model for the simulation of flow and water balance based on orbital data in a poorly monitored basin in the Brazilian Amazon. Geographies, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/geographies3010001
Samadi, A., Sadrolashrafi S. S., & Kholghi M. K. (2019). Development and testing of a rainfall-runoff model for flood simulation in dry mountain catchments: A case study for the Dez River Basin. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 109, 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2018.07.003
Sanders, R., & Tabuchi, S. (2000). Decision support system for flood risk analysis for River Thames, United Kingdom. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 66(10), 1185–1193.
Sanderson, D., & Sharma, A. (2016). IFRC World Disasters Report: Resilience – Saving lives today, investing for tomorrow. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC).
Sharma, A., Mehan, S., McDaniel, R., Arnold, J., Trooien, T., Sammons, N., & Amegbletor, L. (2024). Assessing SWAT+ performance in simulating drainage water management and parameter transferability for watershed-scale applications. Journal of Hydrology, 637, 131338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131338
Sorooshian, S., Hsu, K. L., Coppola, E., Tomassetti, B., Verdecchia, M., & Visconti, G. (Eds.). (2008). Hydrological modelling and the water cycle: coupling the atmospheric and hydrological models (Vol. 63). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77843-1
Tan, M. L., Gassman, P. W., Yang, X., & Haywood, J. (2020). A review of SWAT applications, performance and future needs for simulation of hydro-climatic extremes. Advances in Water Resources, 143, 103662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103662
Tigabu, T. B., Visser, A., Kadir, T., Abudu, S., Cameron-Smith, P., & Dahlke, H. E. (2024). Optimization of the SWAT+ model to adequately predict different segments of a managed streamflow hydrograph. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 69(9), 1198–1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2024.2364714
Tudose, N. C., Marin, M., Cheval, S., Ungurean, C., Davidescu, S. O., Tudose, O. N., Mihalache, A. L., & Davidescu, A. A. (2021). SWAT model adaptability to a small mountainous forested watershed in Central Romania. Forests, 12, 860. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12070860
Van Tol, J., Bieger, K., & Arnold, J. G. (2021). A hydropedological approach to simulate streamflow and soil water contents with SWAT+. Hydrological Processes, 35(6), e14242. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14242
Wagner, P. D., Bieger, K., Arnold, J. G., & Fohrer, N. (2022). Representation of hydrological processes in a rural lowland catchment in Northern Germany using SWAT and SWAT+. Hydrological Processes, 36, e14589. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14589
Wondim, Y. K. (2016). Flood hazard and risk assessment using GIS and remote sensing in Lower Awash Sub-basin, Ethiopia. Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 6(9), 69-86. https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEES/article/view/32924
Yen, H., Park, S., Arnold, J.G., Srinivasan, R., Chawanda, C.J., Wang, R., Feng, Q., Wu, J., Miao, C., Bieger, K., & Daggupati, P. (2019). IPEAT+: A built-in optimization and automatic calibration tool of SWAT+. Water, 11(8), 1681. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11081681

  • Receive Date 15 October 2024
  • Revise Date 09 April 2025
  • Accept Date 19 May 2025