Integrated Watershed Management

Integrated Watershed Management

Social capital in rangeland governance: Network analysis of key actors and social relations (Case study: Tafresh county, Iran)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Leila Shariatyniya 1
Mehdi Ghorbani 1
Hosein Azarnivand 1
Majid Rahimi 2
1 Department of Reclamation of Arid and Mountainous Regions, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
2 Researcher, Social Business Institute, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
10.22034/iwm.2025.2049295.1198
Abstract
Extended Abstract
 Introduction: Achieving sustainable development requires transforming society-nature interactions into synergistic relationships. Effective governance of natural resources, particularly rangelands, requires collaboration and consensus among stakeholders to ensure the adaptability and sustainability of these ecosystems. Social capital, particularly trust and social participation, plays a crucial role in the successful participatory management of common-pool resources. In this context, social network analysis emerges as a valuable tool for identifying relationships and interactions among actors, facilitating the flow of information, and enhancing the effectiveness of management initiatives. This study analyzes social capital in rangeland governance across three customary jurisdictions, focusing on social network structures and key actors.
 Materials and methods: This study investigates the social relationships among rangeland users in three customary rangeland management units—Ahmadabad, Fark, and Nobahar—located in Tafresh County. Data were collected via full-network social network analysis (SNA). A Likert-scale questionnaire assessed trust and participation ties among 33 rangeland users. Data analysis was performed using UCINET software, applying key network metrics such as degree centrality, betweenness centrality, closeness centrality, and structural holes to identify key actors and analyze their relationships. The findings highlight influential actors within each rangeland management unit and their role in facilitating information flow, enhancing participation, and improving rangeland governance. This study provides a deeper understanding of the social structure of rangeland users and its implications for sustainable rangeland management.
 Results and Discussion: SNA revealed significant differences in social network structures across Ahmadabad, Fark, and Nobehar, particularly in participation, trust, and key actors' roles. The findings identified the central actors in each rangeland unit’s social network and their influence on cooperation and information exchange. In Ahmadabad, the actor BH-AG, with the highest in-degree centrality, was recognized as a key player in receiving information and facilitating collective decision-making. Meanwhile, the actor HS-SD, with high out-degree centrality, demonstrated strong social influence and effective communication within the network. These results suggest that empowering these actors could enhance the adaptability of rangeland management and facilitate collective decision-making. Fark’s homogeneous network metrics suggest limited innovation in relationship-building. In Nobahar, the actor ZY-KH emerged as the most influential player, while the participation and trust metrics reflected a complex and diverse network structure.
 Conclusion: In Fark, there exists a strong foundation of trust and relationships among stakeholders that facilitates effective collaboration and participation. This network represents the most successful instance of collaborative governance, characterized by high levels of participation and transparency in decision-making; however, there is a pressing need for innovation. In Nobahar, the trust and willingness to participate among stakeholders are also robust, fostering a sense of responsibility through established processes. Nonetheless, empowerment programs must enhance natural resource management. In contrast, Ahmadabad faces challenges related to the relationships and trust among stakeholders, which negatively impacts cooperation. Enhancing transparency and empowering stakeholders through educational initiatives and workshops is crucial. Fark exemplifies successful collaborative governance; Nobahar shows promise, while Ahmadabad lags in social participation and trust. Strengthening these social dimensions across all jurisdictions has the potential to significantly enhance natural resource management and collaborative governance.
Keywords
Rangeland Users
Social Network Analysis
Tafresh County
Trust
Subjects
Afkhami, M., Zahraie, B., & Ghorbani, M. (2022). Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the dimensions of farmers' adaptive capacity in the face of water scarcity. Journal of Arid Environments, 199, 104715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2022.104715.
Ahmadabad range management plan. (2022). General Administration of Natural Resources and Watershed Management of Central Province. Tafarsh County. (In Persian)
Bodin, Ö. (2017). Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science, 357(6352), eaan1114. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan1114
Bothwell, K. N. (2019). Practicing collaborative natural resource management with federal agencies: Keys to success across partnership structures. Journal of Forestry, 117(3), 226-233. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvz010.
Burgos, A., & Mertens, F. (2022). Collaborative governance networks: exploring governance success in large-scale conservation. Ambiente & Sociedade, 25, e0110. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc20220110L5OA
Chapin, F. S., III, Kofinas, G. P., & Folke, C. (Eds.). (2009). Principles of ecosystem stewardship: Resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73033-2
Cosens, B., Ruhl, J. B., Soininen, N., Gunderson, L., Belinskij, A., Blenckner, T., Camacho, A. E., Chaffin, B. C., Craig, R. K., Doremus, H., Glicksman, R., Heiskanen, A.-S., Larson, R., & Similä, J. (2021). Governing complexity: Integrating science, governance, and law to manage accelerating change in the globalized commons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(36), e2102798118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2102798118
Culloch-Jones, M., Novellie, P., Roux, D. J., & Currie, B. (2022). Social network analysis of a landscape-scale conservation initiative in South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 118(9-10), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2022/11703
Dooley, K. J. (2022). Complex adaptive systems. In Handbook of theories for purchasing, supply chain and management research (pp. 335-344). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839104503.00026.
Eckerd, A., & Heidelberg, R. L. (2020). Administering public participation. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(2), 133-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019871368
Elmezain, M., Othman, E. A., & Ibrahim, H. M. (2021). Temporal degree-degree and closeness-closeness: A new centrality metrics for social network analysis. Mathematics, 9(22), 2850. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9222850
Fark range management plan (1998). General Administration of Natural Resources and Watershed Management of Central Province. Tafarsh County. (In Persian)
Fatemi, M., Rezaei-Moghaddam, K., & Pourghasemi, H. R. (2021). Social networksanalysis of rural stakeholders in watershed management. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(12), 17535-17557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01399-9.
Frija, A., Sghaier, M., Dhehibi, B., & Fetoui, M. (2019). Frameworks, tools, and approaches for the assessment of rangeland governance. International Centre for Research in the Dry Areas.
Galindo-Pérez-de-Azpillaga, L., Foronda-Robles, C., & García-López, A. (2014). The value of trust: An analysis of social capital in natural areas. Social indicators research, 118(2), 673-694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0427-3.
Ghanbari, F., Islami, I., & Azadi, H. (2024). The collaborative governance system of rangelands and social networks analysis: Explaining the challenges of multi-level communication of organizational stakeholders in Semnan Province. Rangeland, 17(4), 665-683. (In Persian)
Ghorbani, M. (2012). The role of social networks in Rangeland Utilization mechanisms (case study: Taleghan region). PhD thesis, University of Tehran. Faculty of Natural Resources. (In Persian)
Ghorbani, M., Rasekhi, S., & Karami, A. (2017). Analysis of structural characteristics of social capital in society oriented rural management establishment (Aliabad Hashtsadmetri Village, rigan district, Kerman Province). Journal of Rural Research, 8(2), 228-241. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2017.62673 (In Persian)
Ghorbani, M. (2022). Water governance in the face of global changes. Third edition. Tehran University Publications. (In Persian)
Ghorbani, M., & Jafarian, V. (2022). Social networks and natural resource management. Third edition. Tehran University Publications. (In Persian)
Guragain, G. P. (2024). Community Engagement in Local Governance. Kutumbha vani, 5(1), 51-60.
Haji, L., Hayati, D., Rezaei-Moghaddam, K., & Ghanbarian, G. A. (2023). Toward co-management of Iran's rangelands: Combining stakeholder analysis and social networks analysis. Global Ecology and Conservation, 46, e02572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02572
Hussein, A. (2021). Courses of Rangeland Degradation and Rehabilitation Techniques in the Rangelands of Ethiopia. Journal of Earth Science & Climatic Change, 12 (10), 582.
Islami, I. (2020). Assessment of the Network of Social Trust structures based on network analysis method: study of local stakeholders of rangelands - Yazd Province. Journal of Rural Research, 11(3), 454-465. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2020.288516.1399 (In Persian)
Laranjeira, P. A., & Cavique, L. (2018). Métricas de centralidade em redes sociais. Revista de Ciências da Computação, (9), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.34627/rcc.v9i0.20.
Levesque, V.R., Calhoun, A.J., Bell, K.P., & Johnson, T.R. (2017). Turning contention into collaboration: engaging power, trust, and learning in collaborative networks. Society & Natural Resources, 30(2), 245-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2016.1180726
Lien, A. M., Dew, T., Ruyle, G. B., Sherman, N. R., Perozzo, N., Miller, M., & López-Hoffman, L. (2021). Trust is essential to the implementation of adaptive management on public lands. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 77, 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2021.03.005
Liu, H., Xing, L., Wang, C., & Zhang, H. (2022). Sustainability assessment of coupled human and natural systems from the perspective of the supply and demand of ecosystem services. Frontiers in Earth Science, 10, 1025787. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.1025787.
Mosleh, L., Yore, M., Wells, W., Eisenman, D. P., & Schwarz, K. (2024). A social network analysis of cross-organizational engagement for urban heat resilience in Los Angeles County, California. Urban Climate, 53, 101797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101797
Musavengane, R., & Kloppers, R. (2020). Social capital: An investment towards community resilience in the collaborative natural resources management of community-based tourism schemes. Tourism Management Perspectives, 34, 100654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100654.
Nobahar range management plan (1996). General Administration of Natural Resources and Watershed Management of Central Province. Tafarsh County. (In Persian)
Nasratpanah, Z., Sahebzadeh, B., & Khaksafidi, A. (2015). The impact of social capital on sustainable development and natural resources. International Conference on Development with a Focus on Agriculture, Environment, and Tourism, Iran. (In Persian)
Omnondiagbe, H. A., Towns, D. R., Wood, J. K., & Bollard-Breen, B. (2017). Stakeholders and social networks identify potential roles of communities in sustainable management of invasive species. Biological Invasions, 19(8), 3037–3049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1506-1
Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419-422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action (Political economy of institutions and decisions). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Przesdzink, F., Herzog, L. M., & Fiebelkorn, F. (2022). Combining stakeholder-and social network-analysis to improve regional nature conservation: A case study from Osnabrück, Germany. Environmental Management, 69(2), 271-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01564-w.
Phelps, D., & Kelly, D. (2020). A call for collaboration: linking local and non-local rangeland communities to build resilience. The Rangeland Journal, 42(5), 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ20048
Rahimi, M., Ghorbani, M., & Azadi, H. (2023). Structural characteristics of governmental and non-governmental institutions network: case of water governance system in Kor River basin in Iran. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(7), 7029-7045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02346-y
Rao, D., Ye, Y., Lin, Z., & Ding, W. (2023). Efficient Approximate Calculations and Application of Network Centrality. In International Conference on Frontier Computing (pp. 7-18). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1428-9_2
Rouleau, L. (2022). Organization Theories in the Making: Exploring the leading-edge perspectives. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198792024.003.0005
Salpeteur, M., Calvet-Mir, L., Diaz-Reviriego, I., & Reyes-García, V. (2017). Networking the environment: social network analysis in environmental management and local ecological knowledge studies. Ecology and Society, 22(1), A41.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08790-220141
Savari, M., Jafari, A., & Sheheytavi, A. (2024). The impact of social capital to improve rural households’ resilience against flooding: evidence from Iran. Frontiers in Water, 6, 1393226. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2024.1393226
Saz-Gil, I., Bretos, I., & Díaz-Foncea, M. (2021). Cooperatives and social capital: A narrative literature review and directions for future research. Sustainability, 13(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020534
Senga, M., & Payne, D. (2017). Social networks and local collaboration in natural resources management in developing countries: a review of the theoretical and empirical literature. Tanzania Journal for Population studies and Development, 24(1-2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.56279/tjpsd.v24i1-2.78
Susilo, R. K. D. (2022). Compatibility, Effectiveness and Sustainability of Grass-Root Collaboration in Promoting Environmental and Natural Resource Conservation (An Evaluative Analysis). In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science , 995(1), 012067. .https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/995/1/012067
Teston, M., Sturaro, E., Muñoz-Ulecia, E., Tenza-Peral, A., Raniolo, S., Pisani, E., & Martín-Collado, D. (2024). Participatory approaches and Social Network Analysis to analyse the emergence of collective action for rural development: a case study in the Spanish Pyrenees. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 23(1), 504-522. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2024.2330658
Tolera, T., & Senbeta, F. (2023). A Social Network Analysis of Collaborative Rangelands Governance: The case of Borana Rangelands, Southern Ethiopia. Human Ecology, 51(3), 429-437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-023-00418-9
Tuna, E., & Stojcheska, A. M. (2020). Stakeholder and Social Networks: Basis for Developing Pasture Management Strategies. In 30th Scientific-Experts Conference of Agriculture and Food Industry: Answers for Forthcoming Challenges in Modern Agriculture (pp. 193-200). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40049-1_25
Vazirian, R., Karimian, A., Ghorbani, M., & Afshani, S. A. (2021). Monitoring and analyzing social networks and identifying key actors for sustainable management of natural resources. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 28 (1), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.22092/ijrdr.2021.123886 (In Persian)  
Wood, B. A., Blair, H. T., Gray, D. I., Kemp, P. D., Kenyon, P. R., Morris, S. T., & Sewell, A. M. (2014). Agricultural science in the wild: A social network analysis of farmer knowledge exchange. PloS one, 9(8), e105203. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105203
Xu, B. (2024). A Review of Research on Structural Holes and Innovation Performance. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 32, 226-236. https://doi.org/10.54097/jp8a9183

  • Receive Date 30 December 2024
  • Revise Date 30 March 2025
  • Accept Date 04 May 2025