Integrated Watershed Management

Integrated Watershed Management

Assessment of groundwater potential using hierarchical analysis (Case study: Ilam Dam watershed)

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Ph.D. student of soil and water conservation, Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Sari university, Sari, Iran
Abstract
Extended Abstract
 Introduction: Drought and population increase are important factors that have caused more attention to ground water. Groundwater is one of the most valuable natural resources that affect human health, economic development and environmental diversity. Due to several inherent characteristics, these waters have become a very important and reliable source of water supply in developed and developing countries. Over the years, the importance of ground water due to the ever-increasing need for water has led to unscientific exploitation of ground water and the creation of water stress conditions. This alarming situation requires a cost-effective technique for proper assessment of groundwater resources and planning for the management of these resources. Geographic information system (GIS) and hierarchical analysis are samples of these tools. The purpose of this research is to prepare the ground water potential map using hierarchical analysis in the Ilam Dam watershed.
Materials and Methods: For this purpose, seven criteria of geology, slope, land use, soil, drainage density, lineament and precipitation were selected to identify the potential areas of ground water. The selection of these parameters is due to the effect that each of these factors has on the ground water. Geological features are important in controlling the infiltration of water into the ground due to the weathering, porosity and fracture that occur in them. On the other hand, increasing the slope of the land causes an increase in runoff. As drainage density increases, permeability decreases. Agricultural, forest and pasture land use can increase infiltration, but residential areas increase runoff due to impervious surfaces. Sandy and loamy soils have a high permeability coefficient, and finally, the higher the rainfall in the region, the higher the groundwater level. In order to prepare these layers, ArcGIS and remote sensing (RS) were used. First, by using the digital elevation model (DEM), the slope of the area, the drainage density in five classes were prepared. By using Landsat 8 satellite images of 2020 and in the environment of RS software, the land use of the region was created in five classes of agriculture, forest, pasture, bare soil and residential areas using a supervised classification method. Kappa coefficient confirmed 93% classification accuracy. The rainfall map of the watershed was also obtained from the synoptic and rain gauge station that existed in and around the basin. Finally, the geology map was prepared from the digital geological map in the GIS environment and the soil map from the Natural Resources Organization. After preparing these layers in the GIS, using the opinion of experts regarding the valuation of these criteria, each of these criteria was given grades from 1 to 9. Then, this valuation was transferred to Expert Choice software to determine the weight, and the weight of each criterion was obtained. Then, using these weights as well as raster layers created in the GIS environment and using the weighted overlay method, these layers were superimposed and the ground water potential map was obtained.
Results: The results showed that geology criteria and land use have the most weight with 0.347 and 0.191, respectively, and soil and precipitation with 0.062 and 0.054 have the least importance for ground water potential. A big part of the watershed has medium to high potential for ground water. This part has a lot of forest and pasture cover, moderate slope (20-40 degrees) and high drainage density and high amount of precipitation, which is consistent with the results of Suri et al. (2016). A significant part of the basin has loam and sand soil, which have high permeability and can absorb water and increase the groundwater level. Kazhdomi formation has medium to high potential and Bangestan group formation has low potential.
Discussion and Conclusion: In general, the final map has four potentials, including very low, low, medium to high, and very high, which respectively account for 0.98%, 41.8%, 55.9%, and 1.32% of the study area. Medium to high potential has the largest area. In general, the north of the watershed has medium to high potential, the south of the watershed has low potential, and a small part of the east of the study area has high potential of ground water. Preparing a map of ground water potential in watersheds can be a suitable strategy for exploiting these resources.
Keywords

Subjects


Abbasi, S. & Hedari, M. (2016). Assessment of ground water potential using AHP techniques and fuzzy logic (case study: Northern basin of Ilam province), Hydrogeomorphology. 6, 75-93. )In persian(.
Adiat, K.A.N., Nawawi, M.N.M. & Abdullah, K. (2012). Assessing the accuracy of GIS-based elementary multi criteria decision analysis as a spatial prediction tool—A case of predicting potential zones of sustainable groundwater resources. J. Hydrol, 440, 75–89.
Alizadeh, A. (2003). Principales of applied hydrology. University of mashhad press. (In Persian).
Chenini, I. & Ben Mammou, A. (2010). Groundwater Recharge Study in Arid Region: An Approach Using GIS Techniques and Numerical Modeling, Computers & Geosciences.36, 801-817.
Duguma, T.A. (2023). RS and GIS analysis of the groundwater potential zones in the Upper Blue Nile River Basin, Ethiopia. Hydrology, 46, 101344.
Fathizad, H., Alipour, H., Hashminasab, S.N. & Karimi, H. (2016). potential of underground water through the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Using remote sensing and geographic information system (case study: mahdishahr). Hydrogeomorphology, Number 8, pp. 1-20. (In Persian).
Ghaforinia, A. (2006). Hydro climatology balance analysis of Hamedan spring plain aquifer and evaluation using computer models PMWIN. Mcs thesis, faculty of agriculture. Bu-Ali sina university. (In Persian).
Haghighi, A., Nohtani, M., Dahmardeh Ghaleno, M.R. & Rafiei Sardooi, E. (2023). Evaluating and detecting potential of groundwater resources using Fuzzy-AHP method and remote sensing data (Case study: Bam-Narmashir plain). Integrated Watershed Management, 3 (1), 16-37. doi: 10.22034/iwm.2023.2001770.1075.
Kaliraj, S., Chandrasekar, N and Magesh, N.S. (2014). Identification of potential groundwater recharge zones in Vaigai upper basin, Tamil Nadu, using GIS-based analytical hierarchical process (AHP) technique. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 7(4), 1385-1401.
Khasheae sivaki, A., Ghahraman, B. & Kochakzadeh, M. (2011). Assessment of the potential of extracting water from the aquifer using the fuzzy hierarchical analysis method (case study: Neyshabur Plain), Iran Water Research, No. 9, pp. 171-180. (In Persian).
Kheirkhah, M., Naseri H. R., Dawoodi M. H. & Salami, H. (2017). Using Hierarchical Analysis Method for prioritizing suitable places for construction of underground Dam (Case Study: Northern Domain of Karkas-Natanz Mountains). Journal of research and construction. 79(1), 1-12. (In Persian)
Li, Y., Abdelkareem, M. & Al-Arifi, N. (2023). Mapping Potential Water Resource Areas Using GIS-Based Frequency Ratio and Evidential Belief Function. Water, 15, 480.
Mahdavi, M. (2008). Applied hydrology volume II, Tehran university press. 240 p. Book.
Mahdavi, A. & Akhavan, S. (2018). Locating and prioritizing areas prone to artificial groundwater feeding based on Boolean logic, overlapping method and fuzzy logic. Iran Scientific Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 12, 5, 1253-1265. (In Persian).
Malczewski, J. (2006). GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 20(7),703 – 726.
Papi, R., S. Hamzeh. & Soleimani, M. (2020). Locating areas prone to artificial groundwater feeding with AHP Fuzzy method in Tehran province. Scientific-Research Journal of Watershed Engineering and Management, Year 12, Number 1, pp. 282-297. (In Persian).
Sekar, I. & Randhir, T. O. (2007). Spatial assessment of conjunctive water harvesting potential in watershed systems. Journal of Hydrology, 334(1-2), 39-52.
Sori, S., Baharvand, S. & Amiri, V. (2017). Finding the potential of underground water resources using the fuzzy hierarchy method (Case study: Rumeshgan Plain). Environmental Geology Quarterly, Year 11, Number, 40, p. (In Persian).
Tavakoli, M., Karimi, H. & Norolahi, H. (2017). Impact of climate change on water resource (case study: ILAM dam watershed). Journal of Watershed Engineering and Management, 10, 2, 157-170.
 

  • Receive Date 13 August 2023
  • Revise Date 09 October 2023
  • Accept Date 25 November 2023