Integrated Watershed Management

Integrated Watershed Management

The use of rainwater in sloping lands for the cultivation of Damask rose

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Department, Markazi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Arak, Agricultural Research Education and Extention Organization (AREEO). Tehran, Iran
2 PhD in horticulture, expert in the field of agricultural Jihad management in Khandab city, Iran
3 M.Sc of horticulture and head of extension department of Agriculture-Jahad Organization of Markazi Province, Arak, Iran
4 M.Sc of horticulture and expert in agriculture and horticulture in Shazand city, Iran
Abstract
Extended Abstract
Introduction: Water limitation is regarded as one of the most important obstacles to agricultural development in arid and semi-arid climate regions. Rainwater harvesting is one of the most significant management methods of rainwater exploitation to deal with water shortage. Due to the wide variety of rainwater extraction methods, in choosing the appropriate method, special attention should be paid to features such as land topography, climate, soil type and socio-economic factors and the amount of water consumption to apply extraction methods in each region. In this research, the promotion of water catchment surface systems in the establishment and development of marigold cultivation in rainfed conditions has been discussed. The use of effective strategies to increase productivity in agriculture has been the focus of researchers for a long time. Any process that leads to the optimal use of rainwater and makes it possible to use it better is known as rainwater harvesting. The aim of this research is to promote the systems of water catchment surfaces in the establishment and development of rose cultivation in rainy conditions.
Materials and methods: The research area was chosen on the northern slope of the village with a slope of about 20%. Soil depth was measured by sampling. An 80 cm deep nationwide channel was dug downstream of the systems with an excavator. The channel was filled with a mixture of straw and stubble and a combination of animal manure with soil (in the amount of 20% by volume) in order to increase the moisture retention capacity in the soil. To carry out the present research, 12 rectangular catchment systems with dimensions of 6 x 5 meters were built using earth mounds on slopes with a 20% slope. These systems, due to being located on the slope and carrying out a series of measures in their beds, cause the production and direction of runoff towards the target point (seedling cultivation site). Downstream of each system, a hole was considered for planting seedlings. The research was carried out in the form of three system treatments including: cleaned ground using a pebble filter in the seedling hole, semi-insulated system treatment using a pebble filter in the seedling hole and a control (natural ground cover) according to local custom. To make a semi-insulated system, the vegetation on the surface of the system was first removed and the system bed was insulated using thick nylon and a 3 cm layer of gravel on it. Also, the downstream part of the system at the seedling pit was paved using the rubble in the area to reduce evaporation. Gravel filters are a column of gravel that is built in the upstream part of the seedling using two polyca pipes with a diameter of 10 cm and a depth of 40 to 50 cm during embankment at the foot of the seedling. Gravel was poured inside the pipes. In order to establish a hydraulic connection between the gravel column and the soil of the pit and its surroundings, the lower part of the pipe was meshed. These filters are used to optimally penetrate the extracted runoff to the depth of tree root development. To build the bare system, vegetation and pebbles were collected from the surface of the system.
   Results and Discussion: In variance analysis, the effect of irrigation treatments on the height trait in 2017 with a probability level of one percent (P<0.01) and in 2018 and 2019 the effect of treatment on the height trait at the probability level (P<0.05) was significant. The highest length of the height belongs to the third treatment (with filter and semi-insulating system) and the lowest height and crown belongs to the control treatment. Regarding the effect of the treatments on the crown length trait, it is significant in all years 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021. In 2019, it is significant at the level of one percent (P < 0.01) and in the years 2017, 2018, 2014 and 2011 at the probability level (P < 0.05). In the years 1400 and 1401, the effect of the treatments on the height trait is not significant. The results show that the effect of the treatments on the crown is greater than that on the height. The highest crown was obtained in the third treatment (with filter and semi-insulated system) and the lowest crown was obtained in the control treatment. According to figure (5), in the years 2017, 2018 and 2019, the total rainfall in the spring season was 247, 285 and 187 mm, respectively, and in the years 1400 and 1401, it was 31 and 14.5 mm, respectively. Rainfall has a direct effect on the treatments. In fact, the amount of rainfall and its management in terms of systems of catchment surfaces, filters and insulation have a direct effect on the amount of moisture at the base of the plant, the water required by the plant, and the vitality of the rose.
Conclusions: The results showed that in the analysis of variance, the effect of irrigation treatments on the height trait in 2017 was significant with a probability level of one percent (P<0.01) and in 2018 and 2019, the effect of the treatment on the height trait was significant at the probability level (P<0.05). The highest length of the height belongs to the third treatment (with filter and semi-insulating system) and the lowest height and crown belongs to the control treatment. Regarding the effect of treatments on crown length in all years 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021, it is significant. In 2019, it is significant at the level of one percent (P < 0.01) and in the years 2017, 2018, 2014 and 2011 at the probability level (P < 0.05). In the years 1400 and 1401, the effect of the treatments on the height trait is not significant. due to the the effect of spring rainfall on filter treatments and semi-insulated and filter systems. 
Keywords

Abu-Zreig, M., Ababneh, F. & Abdullah, F. (2019). Assessment of rooftop rainwater harvesting in northern Jordan. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, (In Press).
Bani Asadi, M. & Panahi, B. (2017). Investigating the effect of using managed catchment levels systems in increasing plant production. Irrigation and Water Engineering Scientific Research Quarterly, (9)34, 207-222. (In Persian)
Deora, S. & Nanore, G. (2019). Socio economic impacts of Doha Model water harvesting structures in Jalna, Maharashtra. Agricultural Water Management, 221, 141-149.
Eshghizadeh, M. (2018). Determination of rainwater extraction potential based on geomorphological factors & series analysis process Maratabi (Klat watershed, Razavi Khorasan). System of rain catchment levels, 7th period, volume 22. (In Persian)
Hashmati, M., Qitouri, M., Sheikh-Vaisi, M., Arab-Khudri, M., & Hosseini, M. (2017). Dealing with the dryness of the Zagros forests with the approaches of collecting rainwater and maintaining soil moisture in order to manage the environmental consequences. Geography and environmental hazards, 23(3), 125-141. (In Persian)
Hosseini, Q., Ahmadi, A. & Bagheri, R. (2014). Evaluation of the effect of the implementation of rain catchment levels on the state of pastures (Case study: dry and semi-arid pastures of Dehlran region). Systems of rain catchment surfaces, 6(1), 57-64. (In Persian)
Jahantigh, M. (2016) Investigating the performance of Torkinset in controlling the runoff of rain catchment surfaces in dry areas (case study of the sour watershed of Sistan). Proceedings of the 5th National Conference on Rain Catchment Surface Systems. Gilan, Rasht, March 2015. (In Persian
Kahinda, J.M., & Taigbenu, A.E., (2011). Rainwater harvesting in South Africa: Challenges and opportunities. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 36(14-15), 968-976.
Meter, K., Basu, N., Tate, E., & Wyckoff, J. (2014). Monsoon harvests: the living legacies of rainwater harvesting systems in South India. Environmental Science & Technology, 48, 4217–4225.
Nekooeimehr, M., & Eliasi, Z. (2017) the effectiveness of using rainwater harvesting methods in improving plant indicators in rainfed conditions, the 6th National Conference on Rainwater Catchment Surface Systems, Bahman, Khomeinishahr. (In Persian).
Qiang, Z., Yuanhong, L., & Manjin, C. (2006), Effect of low-rate irrigation with rainwater harvesting system on the dry farming. The 2nd International RWHM Workshop, IWA 5th world water congress and ehibition. Beijing, china.
Rahimpour, M., Tajbakhsh, M. & Memarian, H. (2016). Use of run off from stone surfaces in supplementary irrigation (Case study: Zashk Abardeh watershed of Targaba Shandiz city). Rain catchment surface systems, 12(3), 73-83. (In Persian)
Rockstroma, J., Karlberg, L., Wani, S.P., Barron J. & Hatibu, N. (2009). Managing water in rainfed agriculture- The need for a paradigm shift, Agricultural Water Management, 87(4), 543-550.
Soltani, M., Soleimani, K., Habib-nejad Roshan, M. & Jalili, Kh. (2018). Comparative location of rainwater collection (Case study: Mekhoran and Khosroabad basins of Kermanshah province). Desert Ecosystem Engineering, 7(18), 49-62. (In Persian)
Stanton, D. (2005). Roaded catchments to improve reliability of farm dams. Government of Western Australia, Department of Agriculture, Bulletin 4660.
Traboulsi, H., & Traboulsi, M. (2015), Rooftop level rainwater harvesting system, Applied Water Science, 7, 769–775.
Wang Y., Xie, Z., Malhi, S.S., Vera, C.L., Zhang, Y. & Wang, J. (2009). Effects of rainfall harvesting and mulching technologies on water use efficiency and crop yield in the semiarid Loess Plateau, China. Agricultural water management, 96(3), 374-382.
Yazar, A., Kuzucu, M., Celik, I., Sezen, S.M. & Jacobsen S.E. (2014). Water harvesting for improved water productivity in dry environments of the Mediterranean region case study: Pistachio in Turkey. Journal of agronomy and crop science, 200(5), 361-370.
Yi, L., Shenjiao, Y., Shiqing, L., Xinping, C. & Fang C. (2010). Growth and development of maize (Zea mays L.) in response to different field water management practices: Resource capture and use efficiency. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 150(4), 606-613.

  • Receive Date 15 August 2022
  • Revise Date 23 August 2022
  • Accept Date 03 October 2022